Author
Listed:
- Özgürbüz, Ekin
- Bektaş, Tolga
- Iris, Çağatay
Abstract
This paper presents a two-stage distributionally robust formulation of combinatorial optimisation problems under uncertainty, wherein the first stage involves integer decisions, the second stage comprises continuous linear problems, and the ambiguity set uses Kullback-Leibler divergence. A tractable reformulation that leverages the properties of the Kullback-Leibler divergence is first proposed. The paper describes a tailored Benders decomposition algorithm enhanced through Pareto-optimal cuts and bounding techniques to obtain the optimal solution. Extensive computational experiments on the robust capacitated facility location problem are conducted to assess solution characteristics and to compare the performance of deterministic, stochastic, and distributionally robust approaches under scenarios characterised by limited observations. Comparative experiments show that our tailored Benders decomposition algorithm consistently outperforms two state-of-the-art solution approaches, particularly on larger instances where benchmark methods fail to return optimal solutions within the time limit. Experiments are also conducted to observe the stability of the proposed framework under limited data and the effects of sample sizes on the computational time. The findings demonstrate the trade-offs between strategic decisions and operational characteristics in determining the index of ambiguity. The robustness of unmet demand characteristics is ensured by increasing first-stage investments, such as the average number of facilities and associated first-stage costs, and decreasing average number of customers per facility and average facility utilisation.
Suggested Citation
Özgürbüz, Ekin & Bektaş, Tolga & Iris, Çağatay, 2026.
"Tailored Benders decomposition for two-stage distributionally robust combinatorial optimisation,"
European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 333(1), pages 53-66.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ejores:v:333:y:2026:i:1:p:53-66
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2026.01.048
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:333:y:2026:i:1:p:53-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.