IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v332y2026i3p992-1003.html

Optimal designs for gamma degradation tests

Author

Listed:
  • Tung, Hung-Ping
  • Chen, Yu-Wen

Abstract

This paper analytically investigates the optimal design of gamma degradation tests, including the number of test units, the number of inspections, and inspection times. We first derive optimal designs with periodic inspection times under various scenarios. Unlike previous studies that typically rely on numerical methods or fix certain design parameters, our approach provides an analytical framework to determine optimal designs. In addition, the results are directly applicable to destructive degradation tests when number of inspection is one. The investigation is then extended to designs with aperiodic inspection times, a topic that has not been thoroughly explored in the existing literature. Interestingly, we show that designs with periodic inspection times are the least efficient. We then derive the optimal aperiodic inspection times and the corresponding optimal designs under two cost constraints. Finally, two examples are presented to validate the proposed methods and demonstrate their efficiency in improving reliability estimation.

Suggested Citation

  • Tung, Hung-Ping & Chen, Yu-Wen, 2026. "Optimal designs for gamma degradation tests," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 332(3), pages 992-1003.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:332:y:2026:i:3:p:992-1003
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.12.043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221725010100
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.12.043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:332:y:2026:i:3:p:992-1003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.