Author
Listed:
- Afsharian, Mohsen
- Bogetoft, Peter
Abstract
This paper addresses the challenge of evaluating existing product alternatives and predicting demand for new entries. We target settings in which historical demand data for the entrant are unavailable or non-analogous, limiting the usefulness of fitted econometric or machine-learning demand models. To this end, two alternative approaches are proposed: the volume-based approach and the benchmarking-based approach. The former, serving as the theoretical backbone of both approaches, forms weight sets that represent the range of attribute weights under which an alternative is preferred over others. By calculating the volumes of these sets – a process involving the Double Description Method and the Quickhull algorithm – we quantify potential demand shifts from new product introductions. The latter approach – less computationally demanding – uses Data Envelopment Analysis as a core component to assess the efficiency of existing products. We also formulate super-efficiency programs to extend the analysis by measuring the degree to which a product alternative surpasses the efficiency frontier. This enables us to predict how the introduction of a new product will reshape the demand landscape. Graphical examples and an empirical illustration within the pharmaceutical industry, specifically focusing on the rather concentrated but competitive market for diabetes medications in Denmark, demonstrate the practical application and the similarity of the results of these approaches.
Suggested Citation
Afsharian, Mohsen & Bogetoft, Peter, 2026.
"Predicting demand for new products using polytope volume and benchmarking,"
European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 332(1), pages 276-289.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ejores:v:332:y:2026:i:1:p:276-289
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.11.005
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:332:y:2026:i:1:p:276-289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.