IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v332y2026i1p156-170.html

The robust beauty of small recent samples

Author

Listed:
  • Lejarraga, José
  • Lejarraga, Tomás
  • Narayanan, Pranadharthiharan

Abstract

Organizational theory typically advises managers to anticipate future conditions by gathering as much information as possible before making decisions. In practice, however, people often rely on small samples of recent experience. What should managers do? We argue that the answer depends on the environment’s structure—particularly its temporal dependence. Our study examines the robustness of relying on small, recent samples as a function of the temporal patterns in the environment. Drawing on simulations, time-series analysis of managerial information environments, and an experiment, we show that reliance on recent samples improves predictive accuracy in temporally dependent environments, that managerial environments are strongly temporally dependent, and, finally, that individuals adapt sample size to match environmental structure. It is therefore good practice for managers to rely on small recent samples in prediction. Together, our findings contribute to behavioral operational research by showing that intuitive reliance on recent experience is not a flaw but an adaptive response to real-world temporal dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Lejarraga, José & Lejarraga, Tomás & Narayanan, Pranadharthiharan, 2026. "The robust beauty of small recent samples," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 332(1), pages 156-170.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:332:y:2026:i:1:p:156-170
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2026.01.024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221726000469
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2026.01.024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:332:y:2026:i:1:p:156-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.