Author
Listed:
- Vogt, Thomas
- Lowery, Ben
- Sachs, Anna-Lena
- Thonemann, Ulrich W.
Abstract
Customer picking behavior plays an important role in retail inventory management. Inventory models often distinguish between picking the freshest items, i.e., last-in-first-out (LIFO), or oldest items first, i.e., first-in-first-out (FIFO). We analyze how picking behavior affects inventory management, and how sustainability messages and price discounts can change picking behavior to increase sales of earlier expiring items and reduce food waste. By conducting an online experiment, we find that: (1) sustainability messages induce more subjects to buy earlier expiring items; (2) higher price discounts increase sales of earlier expiring items; and (3) some subjects do not change their behavior, or crowd out with price discounts. Understanding how different customer types respond to incentives helps retailers offer them only to customers who most likely respond with buying expiring items. We evaluate the effect of these findings on inventories using a periodic review model for perishable items with age-dependent lifetimes. Assuming Poisson and Negative Binomial demand in our numerical study, we find that the retailer’s costs may be up to 30.25% lower under pure FIFO compared to pure LIFO demand. We estimate the cost savings if a retailer nudges customers to change their picking behavior and analyze different FIFO-LIFO splits, which is more realistic than the retailer assuming pure FIFO or LIFO picking behavior. Furthermore, we show that misspecification of the FIFO-LIFO split has a notable effect on inventory costs, in-stock probability and waste, and that the retailer should rather slightly overestimate FIFO than LIFO if actual picking behavior is unknown.
Suggested Citation
Vogt, Thomas & Lowery, Ben & Sachs, Anna-Lena & Thonemann, Ulrich W., 2026.
"Inventory control and picking behavior: The roles of sustainability messages and price discounts,"
European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 331(1), pages 156-169.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ejores:v:331:y:2026:i:1:p:156-169
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.09.028
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:331:y:2026:i:1:p:156-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.