IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v328y2026i2p646-667.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Project monitoring and control with an empirically grounded budget-release model

Author

Listed:
  • Song, Jie
  • Song, Jinbo
  • Browning, Tyson
  • Vanhoucke, Mario

Abstract

Project monitoring and control (PMC) is a process of measuring a project’s progress and taking corrective action when necessary to ensure successful project completion. However, most existing models lack empirical validation of their assumptions and effectiveness, which limits their practical use. We fill in this gap by using empirical data from 97 real projects to calibrate activity-duration distributions and assess activity-duration dependencies, integrating these empirical foundations into an enhanced PMC model. We further improve the model by incorporating budget-release timing constraints and introducing two new policies for crashing and fast-tracking based on a project’s specific time and cost characteristics. Extensive computational experiments using empirical and artificial data evaluate the effectiveness of these policies. Because the budget-release policies and corrective action types depend on project characteristics such as activity-duration dependencies and topological network structure, key insights from this study can be usefully applied by project managers as heuristics even without a detailed model of their project.

Suggested Citation

  • Song, Jie & Song, Jinbo & Browning, Tyson & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2026. "Project monitoring and control with an empirically grounded budget-release model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 328(2), pages 646-667.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:328:y:2026:i:2:p:646-667
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.06.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722172500476X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.06.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:328:y:2026:i:2:p:646-667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.