IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v328y2026i2p620-632.html

Optimizing treatment allocation in the presence of interference

Author

Listed:
  • Caljon, Daan
  • Van Belle, Jente
  • Berrevoets, Jeroen
  • Verbeke, Wouter

Abstract

In Influence Maximization (IM), the objective is to — given a budget — select the optimal set of entities in a network to target with a treatment so as to maximize the total effect. For instance, in marketing, the objective is to target the set of customers that maximizes the total response rate, resulting from both direct treatment effects on targeted customers and indirect, spillover, effects that follow from targeting these customers. Recently, new methods to estimate treatment effects in the presence of network interference have been proposed. However, the issue of how to leverage these models to make better treatment allocation decisions has been largely overlooked. Traditionally, in Uplift Modeling (UM), entities are ranked according to estimated treatment effect, and the top entities are allocated treatment. Since, in a network context, entities influence each other, the UM ranking approach will be suboptimal. The problem of finding the optimal treatment allocation in a network setting is NP-hard, and generally has to be solved heuristically. To fill the gap between IM and UM, we propose OTAPI: Optimizing Treatment Allocation in the Presence of Interference to find solutions to the IM problem using treatment effect estimates. OTAPI consists of two steps. First, a causal estimator is trained to predict treatment effects in a network setting. Second, this estimator is leveraged to identify an optimal treatment allocation by integrating it into classic IM algorithms. We demonstrate that this novel method outperforms classic IM and UM approaches on both synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets.

Suggested Citation

  • Caljon, Daan & Van Belle, Jente & Berrevoets, Jeroen & Verbeke, Wouter, 2026. "Optimizing treatment allocation in the presence of interference," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 328(2), pages 620-632.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:328:y:2026:i:2:p:620-632
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.09.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221725007325
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.09.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sinan Aral & Paramveer S. Dhillon, 2018. "Social influence maximization under empirical influence models," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 2(6), pages 375-382, June.
    2. Vairetti, Carla & Gennaro, Franco & Maldonado, Sebastián, 2024. "Propensity score oversampling and matching for uplift modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(3), pages 1058-1069.
    3. Sinan Aral & Paramveer S. Dhillon, 2018. "Publisher Correction: Social influence maximization under empirical influence models," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 2(9), pages 707-707, September.
    4. Vanderschueren, Toon & Boute, Robert & Verdonck, Tim & Baesens, Bart & Verbeke, Wouter, 2023. "Optimizing the preventive maintenance frequency with causal machine learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    5. Verbeke, Wouter & Olaya, Diego & Guerry, Marie-Anne & Van Belle, Jente, 2023. "To do or not to do? Cost-sensitive causal classification with individual treatment effect estimates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 838-852.
    6. Laura Forastiere & Edoardo M. Airoldi & Fabrizia Mealli, 2021. "Identification and Estimation of Treatment and Interference Effects in Observational Studies on Networks," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 116(534), pages 901-918, April.
    7. Alicia Curth & Mihaela van der Schaar, 2023. "In Search of Insights, Not Magic Bullets: Towards Demystification of the Model Selection Dilemma in Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation," Papers 2302.02923, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Le & Luo, Xin (Robert) & Li, Han, 2022. "Envy or conformity? An empirical investigation of peer influence on the purchase of non-functional items in mobile free-to-play games," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 308-324.
    2. Wang, Yuchen & Wang, Huidi & Gao, Chao & Fan, Kefeng & Cheng, Hailong & Shen, Zhijie & Wang, Zhen & Perc, Matjaž, 2025. "Learning influence probabilities in diffusion networks without timestamps," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 503(C).
    3. Alex Chin & Dean Eckles & Johan Ugander, 2022. "Evaluating Stochastic Seeding Strategies in Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 1714-1736, March.
    4. Ni, Xuelian & Xiong, Fei & Pan, Shirui & Chen, Hongshu & Wu, Jia & Wang, Liang, 2023. "How heterogeneous social influence acts on human decision-making in online social networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    5. Yen-Shao Chen & Tauhid Zaman, 2024. "Shaping opinions in social networks with shadow banning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-30, March.
    6. Christopher Bockel-Rickermann & Sam Verboven & Tim Verdonck & Wouter Verbeke, 2023. "A Causal Perspective on Loan Pricing: Investigating the Impacts of Selection Bias on Identifying Bid-Response Functions," Papers 2309.03730, arXiv.org.
    7. Yang, Bing & Van Aelst, Stefan & Verdonck, Tim, 2026. "Diverse ensemble cost-sensitive logistic regression," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 328(1), pages 282-294.
    8. Bokelmann, Björn & Lessmann, Stefan, 2024. "Improving uplift model evaluation on randomized controlled trial data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(2), pages 691-707.
    9. Andrii Melnychuk, 2024. "Synthetic Controls with spillover effects: A comparative study," Papers 2405.01645, arXiv.org.
    10. Hao, Shiming, 2021. "True structure change, spurious treatment effect? A novel approach to disentangle treatment effects from structure changes," MPRA Paper 108679, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Tiziano Arduini & Edoardo Rainone, 2024. "Partial identification of treatment response under complementarity and substitutability," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1473, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    12. Roberta Di Stefano & Giovanni Mellace, 2020. "The inclusive synthetic control method," Working Papers 21/20, Sapienza University of Rome, DISS.
    13. Sarah Gelper & Ralf van der Lans & Gerrit van Bruggen, 2021. "Competition for Attention in Online Social Networks: Implications for Seeding Strategies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 1026-1047, February.
    14. Fabrizia Mealli & Javier Viviens, 2025. "Difference-in-Differences in the Presence of Unknown Interference," Papers 2512.21176, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    15. Raimondo Pala, 2025. "The causal interpretation of panel vector autoregressions," Papers 2510.23540, arXiv.org.
    16. Sadegh Shirani & Mohsen Bayati, 2025. "On Evolution-Based Models for Experimentation Under Interference," Papers 2511.21675, arXiv.org.
    17. Shaina J. Alexandria & Michael G. Hudgens & Allison E. Aiello, 2023. "Assessing intervention effects in a randomized trial within a social network," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 1409-1419, June.
    18. Edoardo Baldoni & Roberto Esposti, 2025. "The impact of environmental policies on adopters under general interference. The case of EU support to organic farming," Working Papers 497, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    19. Loeys, Stijn & Boute, Robert N. & Antonio, Katrien, 2025. "The use of IoT sensor data to dynamically assess maintenance risk in service contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 324(2), pages 454-465.
    20. Nicolas Debarsy & Julie Le Gallo, 2025. "Identification of Spatial Spillovers: Do's and Don'ts," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 2152-2173, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:328:y:2026:i:2:p:620-632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.