IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v328y2026i2p545-559.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Online quality endorsement to improve consumer trust: Blockchain or self-hosted livestream?

Author

Listed:
  • Niu, Baozhuang
  • Dong, Jian
  • Yu, Xinhu
  • Wang, Yulan

Abstract

Online products have long suffered from consumer distrust, putting them at a disadvantage when online brands compete with offline brands. To address this issue, many online brands have adopted blockchain as a means of quality endorsement to improve consumer trust. Alternatively, livestream e-commerce has shown the capability of both quality endorsement and demand creation by real-time interactions with consumers because the application of AR/VR technology and the use of online sales force can effectively induce the herding mentality. For many small and medium-sized online brands, it remains unclear which approach is better, so we formulate the key tradeoffs in the online brand's choice to improve consumer trust in the presence of offline brand's competition. Our research delves into the influence of three key factors on livestream e-commerce: the cost associated with adopting blockchain technology, the strength of positive network externality, and the potential downside of consumer returns. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we find that when the return cost is high and the network externality in livestream is weak, opting for livestream as a quality endorsement can actually benefit the online brand. We also find that the online brand is capable of mitigating the return cost by transferring it to consumers through charging a high retail price, which increases the likelihood of favoring livestream. Our findings shed light on the building and improvement of online consumer trust, contributing to the high-quality development of online-offline business in the new era of consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Niu, Baozhuang & Dong, Jian & Yu, Xinhu & Wang, Yulan, 2026. "Online quality endorsement to improve consumer trust: Blockchain or self-hosted livestream?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 328(2), pages 545-559.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:328:y:2026:i:2:p:545-559
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.04.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221725002607
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.04.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:328:y:2026:i:2:p:545-559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.