Author
Listed:
- Schiffels, Sebastian
- Jost, Christian
Abstract
A well-known phenomenon related to inventory, but often neglected in inventory management, is the scarcity effect, i.e., the increase in the demand if inventory is low. We consider a repeated purchase setting with a single firm and multiple buyers and address the question of whether inventory management decisions concerning the control policy and the service configuration (determining when and how much to order) impact scarcity behavior arising from buyers’ stock-out perception. We study common inventory control policies that assume a demand independent of the inventory management, and we challenge this critical assumption of an exogenous demand. This research explores two prevalent classes of inventory policies widely used in practice (periodic and continuous) configured according to fill rates, a popular way of measuring service. We conduct a laboratory experiment with four automated inventory management treatments (2 policies × 2 configurations) where participants act as buyers. We observe stock-out induced scarcity and find support for the hypothesis that the periodic policy leads to a stronger effect compared to the continuous policy if the service level is low. The study also supports the hypothesis that buyers act forward-looking as their demand peaks before the inventory reaches its lowest level. Overall, our research provides a new perspective on inventory management as it reveals that the chosen control policy and the selected service configuration influence stock-out pressure induced inventory runs. Inventory managers should be aware of scarcity effects and its consequences, like the disadvantages of a periodic policy for low service level.
Suggested Citation
Schiffels, Sebastian & Jost, Christian, 2026.
"The role of scarcity behavior in inventory management,"
European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 328(1), pages 78-90.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ejores:v:328:y:2026:i:1:p:78-90
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.05.043
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:328:y:2026:i:1:p:78-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.