IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v328y2026i1p309-323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mitigating adversarial attacks on transformer models in credit scoring

Author

Listed:
  • Schwab, Brandon
  • Kriebel, Johannes

Abstract

The integration of unstructured data, such as text created by borrowers, offers new opportunities for improving credit default prediction but also introduces new risks. This study examines the robustness of transformer-based credit scoring models that utilize textual data and assesses their vulnerability to adversarial attacks. Using peer-to-peer lending data, we show that small, semantically neutral changes in loan descriptions can substantially alter model outputs. These vulnerabilities expose lenders and borrowers to economic risks through distorted risk assessments and mispriced loans. We evaluate two mitigation strategies: adversarial training and topic modeling. Adversarial training improves robustness without compromising predictive performance. Topic modeling provides a more interpretable and stable representation of borrower narratives. An economic analysis confirms that robust models reduce mispricing and improve outcomes for all parties. The findings underscore the importance of robustness as the use of unstructured data in credit scoring becomes more accessible.

Suggested Citation

  • Schwab, Brandon & Kriebel, Johannes, 2026. "Mitigating adversarial attacks on transformer models in credit scoring," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 328(1), pages 309-323.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:328:y:2026:i:1:p:309-323
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.05.029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221725004138
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.05.029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:328:y:2026:i:1:p:309-323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.