IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v328y2026i1p189-200.html

Planning Bayesian reliability demonstration tests via a generalized test statistic

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Zan
  • Xu, Jianyu
  • Wang, Chengjie
  • Wang, Xiao-Lin

Abstract

Reliability demonstration testing (RDT) has been extensively employed to verify whether a product meets specific reliability requirements at a desired confidence level. Driven by intense market competition and constrained test resources, manufacturers are motivated to seek effective strategies to reduce the testing efforts required for RDT. In this paper, we propose a method that utilizes existing knowledge and information obtained from the product design and development phase to construct a Bayesian prior distribution of the product’s reliability. Based on this prior, a preliminary disposition decision on whether to accept or reject the product is made. A subsequent demonstration test is needed only when the prior information is deemed insufficient for an immediate disposition. A RDT planning method is developed based on the posterior distribution of the product’s reliability, which is applicable to general cases involving non-conjugate priors. We study two types of demonstration testing: binomial and exponential. For each, we prove the existence of an optimal test plan and develop an efficient searching algorithm to determine it. Numerical studies are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, supplemented by a case study on RDT for systems of different configurations. Overall, this work provides a unified and effective framework for reliability demonstration under the Bayesian paradigm.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Zan & Xu, Jianyu & Wang, Chengjie & Wang, Xiao-Lin, 2026. "Planning Bayesian reliability demonstration tests via a generalized test statistic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 328(1), pages 189-200.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:328:y:2026:i:1:p:189-200
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.08.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221725006277
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.08.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Insua, David Rios & Ruggeri, Fabrizio & Soyer, Refik & Wilson, Simon, 2020. "Advances in Bayesian decision making in reliability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 1-18.
    2. Fernández, Arturo J. & Correa-Álvarez, Cristian D. & Pericchi, Luis R., 2020. "Balancing producer and consumer risks in optimal attribute testing: A unified Bayesian/Frequentist design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 576-587.
    3. Jianyu Xu & Qingpei Hu & Dan Yu & Min Xie, 2017. "Reliability demonstration test for load-sharing systems with exponential and Weibull components," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Emre Yamangil & İ. Altınel & Bora Çekyay & Orhan Feyziog[gtilde]lu & Süleyman Özekici, 2011. "Design of optimum component test plans in the demonstration of diverse system performance measures," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(7), pages 535-546.
    5. Deepak Prajapati & Shuvashree Mondal & Debasis Kundu, 2024. "Two sample Bayesian acceptance sampling plan," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 340(1), pages 425-449, September.
    6. Aven, Terje & Rios Insua, David & Soyer, Refik & Zhu, Xiaoyan & Zio, Enrico, 2025. "Fifty years of reliability in operations research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 324(2), pages 361-381.
    7. Zhang, Hanxiao & Li, Yan-Fu, 2022. "Integrated optimization of test case selection and sequencing for reliability testing of the mainboard of Internet backbone routers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 183-194.
    8. Kim, Seong-Joon & Mun, Byeong Min & Bae, Suk Joo, 2019. "A cost-driven reliability demonstration plan based on accelerated degradation tests," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 226-239.
    9. Shmuel Gal, 1974. "Optimal Test Design for Reliability Demonstration," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1236-1242, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Starling, James K. & Mastrangelo, Christina & Choe, Youngjun, 2021. "Improving Weibull distribution estimation for generalized Type I censored data using modified SMOTE," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    2. Zheng, Huiling & Yang, Jun & Zhao, Yu, 2023. "Reliability demonstration test plan for degraded products subject to Gamma process with unit heterogeneity," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    3. Azeem Ali & Sanku Dey & Haseeb Ur Rehman & Zeeshan Ali, 2019. "On Bayesian reliability estimation of a 1-out-of-k load sharing system model of modified Burr-III distribution," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(5), pages 1052-1081, October.
    4. Mahdi Mokhtarzadeh & Jorge Rodríguez-Echeverría & Ivana Semanjski & Sidharta Gautama, 2025. "Hybrid intelligence failure analysis for industry 4.0: a literature review and future prospective," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 2309-2334, April.
    5. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Jose, Victor Richmond R. & Knowlton, Morgan & Shachter, Ross & Siebert, Johannes Ulrich & Ulu, Canan, 2026. "Fifty years of decision analysis in operational research: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 329(2), pages 355-377.
    6. Eduardo Marcelo Seguin Batadi & Maximiliano Martínez & Marcelo Gustavo Molina, 2024. "Bayesian Entropy Methodology: A Novel Approach to Setting Anti-Islanding Protections with Enhanced Stability and Sensibility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-26, January.
    7. Deligiannis, Michalis & Liberopoulos, George & Pandelis, Dimitrios G., 2023. "Managing supply chain risks with dual sourcing: Bayesian learning of censored supply capacity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    8. Tan, Yunlei & Jiang, Ping & Xing, Yunyan & Qi, Jianjun, 2025. "Type-â… censored reliability qualification test design for weibull products based on expert judgments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    9. Aven, Terje & Rios Insua, David & Soyer, Refik & Zhu, Xiaoyan & Zio, Enrico, 2025. "Fifty years of reliability in operations research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 324(2), pages 361-381.
    10. Zhao, Yunfei & Smidts, Carol, 2022. "Reinforcement learning for adaptive maintenance policy optimization under imperfect knowledge of the system degradation model and partial observability of system states," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    11. Shiva Maharaj & Nicholas Polson & Christian Turk, 2021. "Gambits: Theory and Evidence," Papers 2110.02755, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    12. Alberti, Alexandre R. & Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V., 2020. "A two-scale maintenance policy for protection systems subject to shocks when meeting demands," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    13. Fernández, Arturo J., 2015. "Optimum attributes component test plans for k-out-of-n:F Weibull systems using prior information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 688-696.
    14. Che, Changjia & Wang, Min & Gao, Xiangsheng & Liu, Zhihao & Zhang, Yunfei & Peng, Jun, 2026. "A statistical inference method for predicting the remaining useful life of milling tools based on multi-stress accelerated degradation test," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PB).
    15. M. Kumar & P. N. Bajeel, 2018. "Design of component reliability test plan for a series system having time dependent testing cost with the presence of covariates," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 1267-1292, September.
    16. Qing Tian & Chun-Wu Yeh & Chih-Chiang Fang, 2022. "Bayesian Decision Making of an Imperfect Debugging Software Reliability Growth Model with Consideration of Debuggers’ Learning and Negligence Factors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, May.
    17. Qin, Shuidan & Wang, Bing Xing & Tsai, Tzong-Ru & Wang, Xiaofei, 2023. "The prediction of remaining useful lifetime for the Weibull k-out-of-n load-sharing system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    18. Kuban Altinel, I. & Ozekici, Suleyman, 1998. "Optimum component test plans for systems with dependent components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 175-186, November.
    19. Feyzioglu, Orhan & Kuban Altinel, I. & Ozekici, Suleyman, 2006. "The design of optimum component test plans for system reliability," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(11), pages 3099-3112, July.
    20. Sabnis S. V. & Agnihothram G., 2007. "Reliability Test Plans for Series Systems in the Presence of Covariates," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 22(2), pages 197-209, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:328:y:2026:i:1:p:189-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.