Author
Listed:
- Cheng, Shengyan
- Guo, Qiang
- Anderson, Chris K
Abstract
With the rapid growth of live-streaming commerce, research has largely focused on manufacturers, leaving streamer decision-making underexplored. This study uses game theory to analyze streamers’ product selection strategies, while also examining how streamer types influence these decisions. The findings reveal that: (a) Streamers do not always prioritize high-quality products. Their choices are shaped by various factors, including product pricing, quality gaps, commission ratios, fan-shoppers’ trust, and sales abilities. High-quality manufacturers are advised to collaborate with knowledge-based streamers, while low-quality manufacturers should partner with entertainment-based streamers. Moderate commission ratios can optimize profits for all parties. (b) For well-known products, knowledge-based streamers with strong sales abilities are more likely to select high-quality items, as they can leverage fan-shoppers' willingness to pay. In contrast, entertainment-based streamers do not exhibit this preference. For unknown products, entertainment-based streamers with strong sales abilities may promote low-quality items, even resorting to deception. Interestingly, entertainment-based streamers with weaker sales abilities may promote high-quality products, while knowledge-based streamers may opt for lower-quality options. (c) When product quality is endogenous, streamers with lower sales abilities should focus on entertainment-based content to attract attention. As their sales abilities improve and fan-shoppers’ trust grows, they should transition to knowledge-based content.
Suggested Citation
Cheng, Shengyan & Guo, Qiang & Anderson, Chris K, 2025.
"When and should streamers choose high-quality products? Effects of streamer types,"
European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 327(3), pages 971-985.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ejores:v:327:y:2025:i:3:p:971-985
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.05.057
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:327:y:2025:i:3:p:971-985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.