Author
Listed:
- Corrente, Salvatore
- Greco, Salvatore
- Zappalà, Silvano
Abstract
We consider the recently introduced application of the Deck of Cards Method (DCM) to ordinal regression proposing two extensions related to two main research trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding, namely scaling and ordinal regression generalizations. On the one hand, procedures, different from DCM (e.g. AHP, BWM, MACBETH) to collect and elaborate Decision Maker’s (DM’s) preference information are considered to define an overall evaluation of reference alternatives. On the other hand, Robust Ordinal Regression and Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis are used to offer the DM more detailed and realistic decision-support outcomes. More specifically, we consider preference imprecision and indetermination through a set of admissible comprehensive evaluations of alternatives provided by the whole set of value functions compatible with DM’s preference information rather than relying on a single definitive evaluation based on one value function. In addition, we also consider alternatives evaluated on a set of criteria hierarchically structured. The methodology we propose allows the DM to provide precise or imprecise information at different levels of the hierarchy of criteria. Like scaling procedures, the compatible value function we consider can be of a different nature, such as weighted sum, linear or general monotone value function, or Choquet integral. Consequently, the approach we propose is versatile and well-equipped to be adapted to DM’s characteristics and requirements. The applicability of the proposed methodology is shown by a didactic example based on a large ongoing research project in which Italian regions are evaluated on criteria representing Circular Economy, Innovation-Driven Development and Smart Specialization Strategies.
Suggested Citation
Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore & Zappalà, Silvano, 2025.
"Deck of Cards Method for Hierarchical, Robust and Stochastic Ordinal Regression,"
European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 327(3), pages 937-956.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ejores:v:327:y:2025:i:3:p:937-956
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.05.025
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:327:y:2025:i:3:p:937-956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.