IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v327y2025i1p191-202.html

Indiscriminate disruption of conditional inference on multivariate Gaussians

Author

Listed:
  • Caballero, William N.
  • LaRosa, Matthew
  • Fisher, Alexander A.
  • Tarokh, Vahid

Abstract

The multivariate Gaussian distribution underpins myriad operations-research, decision-analytic, and machine-learning models (e.g., Bayesian optimization, Gaussian influence diagrams, and variational autoencoders). However, despite recent advances in adversarial machine learning (AML), inference for Gaussian models in the presence of an adversary is notably understudied. Therefore, we consider a self-interested attacker who wishes to disrupt a decisionmaker’s conditional inference and subsequent actions by corrupting a set of evidentiary variables. To avoid detection, the attacker also desires the attack to appear plausible wherein plausibility is determined by the density of the corrupted evidence. We consider white- and grey-box settings such that the attacker has complete and incomplete knowledge about the decisionmaker’s underlying multivariate Gaussian distribution, respectively. Select instances are shown to reduce to quadratic and stochastic quadratic programs, and structural properties are derived to inform solution methods. We assess the impact and efficacy of these attacks in three examples, including, a real estate evaluation application, an interest rate prediction task, and the use of linear Gaussian state space models. Each example leverages an alternative underlying model, thereby highlighting the attacks’ broad applicability. Through these applications, we also juxtapose the behavior of the white- and grey-box attacks to understand how uncertainty and structure affect attacker behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Caballero, William N. & LaRosa, Matthew & Fisher, Alexander A. & Tarokh, Vahid, 2025. "Indiscriminate disruption of conditional inference on multivariate Gaussians," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 327(1), pages 191-202.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:327:y:2025:i:1:p:191-202
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.06.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221725004837
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.06.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Rios Insua & Roi Naveiro & Víctor Gallego & Jason Poulos, 2023. "Adversarial Machine Learning: Bayesian Perspectives," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 118(543), pages 2195-2206, July.
    2. Ekin, Tahir & Naveiro, Roi & Ríos Insua, David & Torres-Barrán, Alberto, 2023. "Augmented probability simulation methods for sequential games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 418-430.
    3. Powell, Warren B., 2019. "A unified framework for stochastic optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 795-821.
    4. Insua, Insua Rios & Rios, Jesus & Banks, David, 2009. "Adversarial Risk Analysis," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(486), pages 841-854.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salo, Ahti & Andelmin, Juho & Oliveira, Fabricio, 2022. "Decision programming for mixed-integer multi-stage optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 550-565.
    2. Sheng Liu & Zhixing Luo, 2023. "On-Demand Delivery from Stores: Dynamic Dispatching and Routing with Random Demand," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 595-612, March.
    3. Lee, Jinkyu & Bae, Sanghyeon & Kim, Woo Chang & Lee, Yongjae, 2023. "Value function gradient learning for large-scale multistage stochastic programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 321-335.
    4. Benedikt Finnah, 2022. "Optimal bidding functions for renewable energies in sequential electricity markets," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(1), pages 1-27, March.
    5. Preil, Deniz & Krapp, Michael, 2022. "Bandit-based inventory optimisation: Reinforcement learning in multi-echelon supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    6. Glanzer, Martin & Maier, Sebastian & Pflug, Georg Ch., 2025. "Guaranteed bounds for optimal stopping problems using kernel-based non-asymptotic uniform confidence bands," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 327(1), pages 162-173.
    7. Ghadimi, Saeed & Powell, Warren B., 2024. "Stochastic search for a parametric cost function approximation: Energy storage with rolling forecasts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 641-652.
    8. Visentin, Andrea & Prestwich, Steven & Rossi, Roberto & Tarim, S. Armagan, 2021. "Computing optimal (R,s,S) policy parameters by a hybrid of branch-and-bound and stochastic dynamic programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 91-99.
    9. Hausken, Kjell, 2024. "Fifty Years of Operations Research in Defense," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(2), pages 355-368.
    10. André Snoeck & Matthias Winkenbach, 2022. "A Discrete Simulation-Based Optimization Algorithm for the Design of Highly Responsive Last-Mile Distribution Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 201-222, January.
    11. Mohammad E. Nikoofal & Mehmet Gümüs, 2015. "On the value of terrorist’s private information in a government’s defensive resource allocation problem," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(6), pages 533-555, June.
    12. Santos, A.M.P. & Fagerholt, Kjetil & Laporte, Gilbert & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "A stochastic optimization approach for the supply vessel planning problem under uncertain demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 209-228.
    13. Jason R. W. Merrick & Laura A. McLay, 2010. "Is Screening Cargo Containers for Smuggled Nuclear Threats Worthwhile?," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 155-171, June.
    14. Xue Luo & Li Li & Lei Zhao & Jianfeng Lin, 2022. "Dynamic Intra-Cell Repositioning in Free-Floating Bike-Sharing Systems Using Approximate Dynamic Programming," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 799-826, July.
    15. Ríos Insua, David & Ruggeri, Fabrizio & Soyer, Refik & Rasines, Daniel G., 2018. "Adversarial issues in reliability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 1113-1119.
    16. Stefan Rass & Sandra König & Stefan Schauer, 2017. "Defending Against Advanced Persistent Threats Using Game-Theory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-43, January.
    17. Luca Allodi & Fabio Massacci, 2017. "Security Events and Vulnerability Data for Cybersecurity Risk Estimation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(8), pages 1606-1627, August.
    18. Finnah, Benedikt & Gönsch, Jochen & Ziel, Florian, 2022. "Integrated day-ahead and intraday self-schedule bidding for energy storage systems using approximate dynamic programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 726-746.
    19. William N. Caballero & Phillip R. Jenkins & David Banks & Matthew Robbins, 2026. "Bayesian Graph Traversal," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 11-27, March.
    20. Ambrosius, M. & Egerer, J. & Grimm, V. & Weijde, A.H. van der, 2020. "Uncertain bidding zone configurations: The role of expectations for transmission and generation capacity expansion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(1), pages 343-359.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:327:y:2025:i:1:p:191-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.