IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v326y2025i1p96-110.html

Dynamic reconfigurations of matrix assembly layouts

Author

Listed:
  • Bayraktar, O. Baturhan
  • Grunow, Martin
  • Kolisch, Rainer

Abstract

Traditional assembly lines have become less efficient due to increasing customization and changing demand (e.g., the trend in e-vehicles). Matrix assembly systems, in which automated guided vehicles move products between the workstations laid out on a grid, are gaining popularity. One advantage of such systems is that they are easier to reconfigure compared to traditional assembly lines. In this work, we develop a methodology for the configuration and reconfiguration of matrix assembly layouts under changing demand. The decisions consist of selecting active stations, task assignments, and product flows for each period of a multi-period planning horizon. The three objective functions minimize the number of active stations, the number of reconfigurations, and the total flow distance. We formulate a lexicographic multi-objective mixed-integer linear programming model for this problem. We develop an exact solution approach using period-based, layout-based, and Benders decompositions. For our numerical tests, we adapt standard instances from the literature. In terms of computational performance, our approach is, on average, 53.3% faster than the original MIP solved with a commercial solver for practice-size instances. Our insights reveal that matrix layouts with dynamic reconfigurations enhance the active number of stations by 31.3% and reduce flow distances by 12.4% on average, compared to static layouts.

Suggested Citation

  • Bayraktar, O. Baturhan & Grunow, Martin & Kolisch, Rainer, 2025. "Dynamic reconfigurations of matrix assembly layouts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 326(1), pages 96-110.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:326:y:2025:i:1:p:96-110
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.03.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221725002206
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.03.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boysen, Nils & Schulze, Philipp & Scholl, Armin, 2022. "Assembly line balancing: What happened in the last fifteen years?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 797-814.
    2. Safaei, N. & Saidi-Mehrabad, M. & Jabal-Ameli, M.S., 2008. "A hybrid simulated annealing for solving an extended model of dynamic cellular manufacturing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(2), pages 563-592, March.
    3. Weckenborg, Christian & Schumacher, Patrick & Thies, Christian & Spengler, Thomas S., 2024. "Flexibility in manufacturing system design: A review of recent approaches from Operations Research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 413-441.
    4. Mingyuan Chen, 1998. "A mathematical programming model for system reconfiguration in a dynamic cellular manufacturing environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 77(0), pages 109-128, January.
    5. Utku Girit & Meral Azizoğlu, 2021. "Rebalancing the assembly lines with total squared workload and total replacement distance objectives," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(22), pages 6702-6720, November.
    6. Defersha, Fantahun M. & Chen, Mingyuan, 2006. "A comprehensive mathematical model for the design of cellular manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 767-783, October.
    7. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte & Scholl, Armin, 2007. "A classification of assembly line balancing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 674-693, December.
    8. Arnd Huchzermeier & Tobias Mönch, 2023. "Mixed‐model assembly lines with variable takt and open stations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(3), pages 704-722, March.
    9. Kuldeep Lamba & Ravi Kumar & Shraddha Mishra & Shubhangini Rajput, 2020. "Sustainable dynamic cellular facility layout: a solution approach using simulated annealing-based meta-heuristic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 5-26, July.
    10. Andreas Hottenrott & Martin Grunow, 2019. "Flexible layouts for the mixed-model assembly of heterogeneous vehicles," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(4), pages 943-979, December.
    11. Abdelkrim R. Yelles-Chaouche & Evgeny Gurevsky & Nadjib Brahimi & Alexandre Dolgui, 2021. "Reconfigurable manufacturing systems from an optimisation perspective: a focused review of literature," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(21), pages 6400-6418, November.
    12. Andreas Hottenrott & Maximilian Schiffer & Martin Grunow, 2023. "Flexible assembly layouts in smart manufacturing: An impact assessment for the automotive industry," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(11), pages 1144-1159, November.
    13. Singh, N., 1993. "Design of cellular manufacturing systems: An invited review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 284-291, September.
    14. Yosra Mezghani & S. Ehsan Hashemi-Petroodi & Simon Thevenin & Alexandre Dolgui, 2024. "Robust design and reconfiguration planning of mixed-model assembly lines under uncertain evolutions of product family," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(13), pages 4957-4979, July.
    15. Rahmaniani, Ragheb & Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Gendreau, Michel & Rei, Walter, 2017. "The Benders decomposition algorithm: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 801-817.
    16. Bukchin, Yossi & Rabinowitch, Ithai, 2006. "A branch-and-bound based solution approach for the mixed-model assembly line-balancing problem for minimizing stations and task duplication costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 492-508, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weckenborg, Christian & Schumacher, Patrick & Thies, Christian & Spengler, Thomas S., 2024. "Flexibility in manufacturing system design: A review of recent approaches from Operations Research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 413-441.
    2. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2022. "Hybridizations in line balancing problems: A comprehensive review on new trends and formulations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    3. Ah kioon, Steve & Bulgak, Akif Asil & Bektas, Tolga, 2009. "Integrated cellular manufacturing systems design with production planning and dynamic system reconfiguration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(2), pages 414-428, January.
    4. Safaei, Nima & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza, 2009. "Integrated multi-period cell formation and subcontracting production planning in dynamic cellular manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 301-314, August.
    5. Boysen, Nils & Schulze, Philipp & Scholl, Armin, 2022. "Assembly line balancing: What happened in the last fifteen years?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 797-814.
    6. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2013. "A taxonomy of line balancing problems and their solutionapproaches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 259-277.
    7. Hamta, Nima & Fatemi Ghomi, S.M.T. & Jolai, F. & Akbarpour Shirazi, M., 2013. "A hybrid PSO algorithm for a multi-objective assembly line balancing problem with flexible operation times, sequence-dependent setup times and learning effect," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 99-111.
    8. Sikora, Celso Gustavo Stall, 2024. "Balancing mixed-model assembly lines for random sequences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 597-611.
    9. Schmid, Nico André & Montreuil, Benoit & Limère, Veronique, 2024. "Modeling and solving integrated assembly line balancing, assembly line feeding, and facility sizing problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    10. Elyasi, Milad & Thevenin, Simon & Cerqueus, Audrey & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2026. "Markov Decision Process for Mixed-Model Assembly Line design under process time uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    11. A. Attila İşlier, 2015. "Cellular Manufacturing Systems: Organization, Trends and Innovative Methods," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 3(2), pages 13-26, December.
    12. Hosseini, Amir & Otto, Alena & Pesch, Erwin, 2024. "Scheduling in manufacturing with transportation: Classification and solution techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 821-843.
    13. Jordi Pereira & Mariona Vilà, 2025. "An Evolutionary Procedure for a Bi-Objective Assembly Line Balancing Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-30, October.
    14. Andreas Hottenrott & Martin Grunow, 2019. "Flexible layouts for the mixed-model assembly of heterogeneous vehicles," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(4), pages 943-979, December.
    15. Nai-Chieh Wei, 2013. "An Electromagnetism-Like Mechanism Method for Solving Dynamic Cell Formation Problems," Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(10), pages 1022-1035, October.
    16. Schulze, Philipp & Scholl, Armin & Walter, Rico, 2024. "R-SALSA: A branch, bound, and remember algorithm for the workload smoothing problem on simple assembly lines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 38-55.
    17. Hu, Linyuan & Zhang, Yuli & Wen, Muyang & Leus, Roel & Zhang, Ningwei, 2025. "Robust parallel machine selection and scheduling with uncertain release times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 327(3), pages 838-856.
    18. Esmaeilbeigi, Rasul & Mak-Hau, Vicky & Yearwood, John & Nguyen, Vivian, 2022. "The multiphase course timetabling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 1098-1119.
    19. Özgün Elçi & John Hooker, 2022. "Stochastic Planning and Scheduling with Logic-Based Benders Decomposition," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2428-2442, September.
    20. Shi, Zhiyuan & Hong, Shaozhi & Wang, Zeling & Li, Ang, 2026. "Exact solution approaches for the traveling salesman problem with a drone station," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 328(3), pages 845-861.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:326:y:2025:i:1:p:96-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.