IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v326y2025i1p174-188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pareto front for two-stage distributionally robust optimization problems

Author

Listed:
  • Agra, Agostinho
  • Rodrigues, Filipe

Abstract

Two-stage distributionally robust optimization is a recent optimization technique to handle uncertainty that is less conservative than robust optimization and more flexible than stochastic programming. The probability distribution of the uncertain parameters is not known but is assumed to belong to an ambiguity set. The size of certain types of ambiguity sets - such as several discrepancy-based ambiguity sets - is defined by a single parameter that makes it possible to control the degree of conservatism of the underlying optimization problem. Finding the values to assign to this parameter is a very relevant research topic. Hence, in this paper, we propose an exact and several heuristic methods for determining the control parameter values leading to all the relevant first-stage solutions. Our algorithmic approach resembles the ϵ−constrained method used to generate the Pareto front of a bi-objective problem. To demonstrate the applicability and efficacy of the proposed approaches, we conduct experiments on three different problems: scheduling, berth allocation, and facility location. The results obtained indicate that the proposed approaches provide sets of first-stage solutions very close to the optimal in a reasonable time.

Suggested Citation

  • Agra, Agostinho & Rodrigues, Filipe, 2025. "Pareto front for two-stage distributionally robust optimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 326(1), pages 174-188.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:326:y:2025:i:1:p:174-188
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.04.053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221725003558
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.04.053?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:326:y:2025:i:1:p:174-188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.