IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v325y2025i3p400-415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sequencing with learning, forgetting and task similarity

Author

Listed:
  • Xu, Shuling
  • Xie, Fulong
  • Hall, Nicholas G.

Abstract

In human–machine workplaces, employee skills change over time due to learning and forgetting effects, which greatly affects efficiency. We model these effects within a simple production system. When a job is processed, due to learning the next job of the same type requires less processing time. Meanwhile, jobs of other types are forgotten, hence their future processing times increase. In our work, the amount of learning and forgetting depends on the full matrix similarity of the two job types and on the size of the jobs processed. We describe a dynamic programming algorithm that minimizes the makespan optimally. More generally, the learning level of a job type has an upper limit above which further learning is lost, and a lower limit below which further forgetting is saved. For this more general problem, we adapt our dynamic programming algorithm to provide tight lower bounds that validate the performance of simple heuristic approaches and genetic algorithms. A computational study demonstrates that these procedures routinely deliver optimal, or very close to optimal, solutions for up to eight job types and 80 jobs. Our work provides what are apparently the first effective procedures for optimization of large-scale production schedules with learning and forgetting effects defined by full matrix similarity. This identifies a critical opportunity for human–machine collaboration to improve productivity and support operational excellence.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu, Shuling & Xie, Fulong & Hall, Nicholas G., 2025. "Sequencing with learning, forgetting and task similarity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 325(3), pages 400-415.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:325:y:2025:i:3:p:400-415
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.03.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221725001821
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.03.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:325:y:2025:i:3:p:400-415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.