IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v292y2021i1p299-310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impacts of mergers, capacity expansion and adoptions on animal shelter performance: A queuing analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Turken, Nazli
  • Carrillo, Janice E.
  • Paul, Anand

Abstract

According to the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), approximately 23% of the animals that enter shelters each year are euthanized. Many animal shelters strive to reduce euthanization and the stray animal population through capacity expansion, adoption increasing programs, and mergers. In this paper, we define, compare and perform sensitivity analysis of performance metrics for animal shelter involving loss queues. We ultimately provide recommendations for animal shelters on the most efficient investments, and analyze the effects of mergers and capacity expansion on various performance metrics. We represent animal shelters by utilizing loss queues with and without reneging and perform sensitivity analysis by calculating the asymptotic expansion of the performance metrics for various cases. We find that the euthanization in traditional shelters is not monotonically decreasing with increases in the demand for animals. A counterintuitive result shows that increasing the capacity in a traditional shelter (or merging two traditional shelters together) does not necessarily decrease the number of animals euthanized. Our results related to the performance metrics Erlang loss queues can be utilized for any type of queuing system with involuntary departures.

Suggested Citation

  • Turken, Nazli & Carrillo, Janice E. & Paul, Anand, 2021. "The impacts of mergers, capacity expansion and adoptions on animal shelter performance: A queuing analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(1), pages 299-310.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:292:y:2021:i:1:p:299-310
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.10.022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221720308985
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.10.022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:292:y:2021:i:1:p:299-310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.