IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ehbiol/v61y2026ics1570677x26000262.html

The impact of personalised weight feedback on heart attack incidence: A regression discontinuity approach

Author

Listed:
  • Cook, Will

Abstract

This study investigates whether providing individuals with feedback about their weight status influences long-term health outcomes, specifically the incidence of myocardial infarction (heart attack) over a 13–19 year period. Using data from the UK Biobank, where participants received weight status feedback based on Body Mass Index (BMI) thresholds, the study employs a regression discontinuity design to estimate the causal impact of receiving adverse weight information. The findings reveal that such feedback reduces the risk of myocardial infarction by 0.6 %age points, representing an approximate 18% relative risk reduction. While the magnitude of the effect is modest, the low cost and scalability of information-based interventions suggest a potential value in preventative healthcare. These results contribute to the literature by linking personalised health information not just to behavioural change, but to tangible long-term health outcomes. The study supports the integration of weight feedback into routine screening programmes as a cost-effective strategy to mitigate heart attack risk and improve population health as part of preventative health policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Cook, Will, 2026. "The impact of personalised weight feedback on heart attack incidence: A regression discontinuity approach," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ehbiol:v:61:y:2026:i:c:s1570677x26000262
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2026.101596
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570677X26000262
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ehb.2026.101596?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ehbiol:v:61:y:2026:i:c:s1570677x26000262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/622964 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.