Author
Listed:
- Al-Haideri, Rulla
- Ismail, Karim
- Weiss, Adam
Abstract
Cyclists navigating roundabout crosswalks face heightened crash risk due to ambiguous right-of-way rules and the absence of signal control. Understanding their operational behaviour at these conflict points is essential for designing safer facilities. Existing behavioural models often overlook the way cyclists perceive vehicle motion when deciding to cross and spatial dependence among feasible trajectories. This study develops a Generalized Spatially Correlated Nested Logit (GSCNL) model to capture cyclists' decision processes when crossing in the presence of motorized vehicles. The model extends the spatial Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) framework to represent correlation among spatially adjacent movement alternatives. Each alternative corresponds to a potential future position that a cyclist may occupy at the next time step. Spatial grouping is used to model dependencies among neighbouring choices. Two perception assumptions were investigated: (1) cyclists perceive interacting vehicles as moving in constant velocity, and (2) cyclists perceive vehicles as following curved paths. Results show that the constant-velocity formulation provides a superior fit, suggesting that cyclists may not exhibit strong perceptual sensitivity to vehicle acceleration. The proposed GSCNL and the conventional Spatially Correlated Nested Logit (SCNL) model achieved a similar overall fit. However, the GSCNL offered enhanced interpretability of non-proportional substitution patterns through its spatial correlation structure. The findings suggest potential advancements in spatial choice modelling of vulnerable road users. They may also inform the development of safer roundabout designs that better reflect the behavioural mechanisms underlying cyclists’ crossing decisions.
Suggested Citation
Al-Haideri, Rulla & Ismail, Karim & Weiss, Adam, 2026.
"Cyclists’ crossing behaviour at roundabouts: A Generalized Spatially Correlated Nested Logit model,"
Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:59:y:2026:i:c:s1755534526000126
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2026.100606
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:59:y:2026:i:c:s1755534526000126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-choice-modelling .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.