Author
Listed:
- Ghaderi, Sadegh
- Hemami, Mohammad
- Khosrowabadi, Reza
- Rad, Jamal Amani
Abstract
The prevalence of methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) as a major public health problem has increased dramatically over the last two decades, reaching epidemic levels, which pose high costs to the health care systems worldwide and is commonly associated with experience-based decision-making (EDM) aberrant. However, precise mechanisms underlying such non-optimally in choice patterns still remain poorly understood. In this study, to uncover the latent neurobiological and psychological meaningful processes of such impairment, we apply a reinforcement learning diffusion decision model (RL-DDM) while methamphetamine abuser participants (n=18, all men; mean (±SD) age: 27.3±5) and age/sex-matched healthy controls (n=25, all men; mean (±SD) age: 26.8.0±3.63) perform choices to resolve uncertainty within a simple probabilistic learning task with rewards and punishments. Preliminary behavior results indicated that addicts made maladaptive patterns of learning that mirrored in both choices and response times (RTs). Furthermore, modeling results revealed that such EDM impairment (maladaptive pattern in optimal selection) in addicts was more imputable to both increased learning rates (more sensitive to outcome fluctuations) and decreased drift rate (less reward sensitivity) compared to healthy. In addition, addicts also showed substantially longer non-decision times (attributed to slower RTs), as well as lower decision boundary criteria (reflection of impulsive choice). Taken together, our findings reveal precise mechanisms associated with EDM impairments in methamphetamine use disorder and confirm the debility of the options values assignment system as the main hub in learning-based decision making.
Suggested Citation
Ghaderi, Sadegh & Hemami, Mohammad & Khosrowabadi, Reza & Rad, Jamal Amani, 2024.
"The role of reinforcement learning in shaping the decision policy in methamphetamine use disorders,"
Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:50:y:2024:i:c:s1755534524000022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2024.100469
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:50:y:2024:i:c:s1755534524000022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-choice-modelling .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.