IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v520y2026ics0304380026002206.html

What dominates the variation of Mining footprint ecological resilience based on explainable machine learning-Evidence from the typical resource-based city, China

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Keqi
  • Yan, Qingwu
  • Li, Fei
  • Guo, Andong
  • Yi, Minghao
  • Tian, Jiaqi
  • Wu, Zihao
  • Li, Guie

Abstract

Accurately assessing the ecological resilience of mining footprints (MER) and elucidating its driving mechanisms are crucial for enabling the sustainable transition of resource-based cities (RBC). However, conventional methods struggle to capture the complex nonlinear relationships inherent in MER dynamics. To address the limitations in parsing complex nonlinear relationships, the paper developed a multidimensional assessment framework for MER, termed the ARTS framework. Applied to typical RBC in China, this framework was combined with Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) modeling and SHAP analysis to identify key drivers of MER and their nonlinear interactions. The results reveal three key findings: (1) The overall MER exhibited a fluctuating yet upward trend from 2000 to 2023, with its temporal evolution transitioning through stages of slow ascent, accelerated enhancement, and high-level fluctuation. Spatially, MER exhibited a clear stepwise decline from the southeastern coast toward the northwestern interior. Southern China had the highest mean MER value of 10.10, followed by Southwest China with 8.56 and Northeast China with 8.10. (2) The GBDT model significantly outperformed traditional linear models. AOD and LUCC were the most critical drivers of MER, with feature importance scores of 0.4323 and 0.2872, respectively. These factors exhibited pronounced threshold effects. Conditions most conducive to higher MER were associated with an NDVI above 0.6, a mean temperature near 20 °C, a GDP density exceeding 7000 units/km2, a population density between 1666 and 2797 persons/km2, and a forest-dominated land use pattern. (3) Furthermore, significant interaction effects were observed among drivers. Notably, the synergy between AOD and ecological baseline factors such as NPP, PRE, and NDVI generates a compound ecological pressure characteristic of resource-intensive landscapes. This study proposes a novel assessment framework that enhances the mechanistic understanding of MER in RBC. By integrating explainable machine learning with ecological analysis, this research offers both theoretical insights into the nonlinear dynamics of coupled human-natural systems and practical guidance for implementing threshold-based, differentiated restoration strategies. The framework and findings provide a transferable reference for MER assessment in other resource-dependent regions worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Keqi & Yan, Qingwu & Li, Fei & Guo, Andong & Yi, Minghao & Tian, Jiaqi & Wu, Zihao & Li, Guie, 2026. "What dominates the variation of Mining footprint ecological resilience based on explainable machine learning-Evidence from the typical resource-based city, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 520(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:520:y:2026:i:c:s0304380026002206
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2026.111692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380026002206
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2026.111692?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:520:y:2026:i:c:s0304380026002206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.