Author
Listed:
- Gergs, André
- Brattig, Dagmar
- Fois, Franco
- Marienhagen, Christian
Abstract
Insect-plant interactions are critical in ecological and agricultural systems, often resulting in significant economic losses due to herbivory. This study introduces a Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) based toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic (TKTD) model for understanding and managing these interactions, focusing on the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) and its impact on maize (Zea mays). Our objectives were to parameterize a DEB-TKTD model for S. frugiperda develop a simplified DEB model for maize and integrate these models to predict larval feeding rates and plant damage under varying conditions. Laboratory bioassays provided data for model calibration, involving different application rates of the insecticide tetraniliprole. The DEB-TKTD model effectively captured the feeding inhibition in larvae exposed to tetraniliprole. Simulations indicated that even low application rates could significantly reduce feeding activity in the laboratory, with smaller larvae being more susceptible. The plant model accurately described maize growth and dry matter partitioning, aligning well with empirical data. Integrated model simulations demonstrated that larval feeding damage increased with population density and temperature. The model also indicated that plant damage varied with the timing of insecticide application. These findings were consistent with field observations and highlighted the importance of optimizing application timing and understanding underlying mechanisms for effective pest management. In conclusion, while there is potential for further refinement, the current model provides a valuable tool for exploring management thresholds and application strategies to mitigate S. frugiperda infestations, thereby supporting sustainable agricultural practices.
Suggested Citation
Gergs, André & Brattig, Dagmar & Fois, Franco & Marienhagen, Christian, 2026.
"Towards an energy budget based toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic model for insect-plant interactions,"
Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 519(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:519:y:2026:i:c:s0304380026001572
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2026.111629
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:519:y:2026:i:c:s0304380026001572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.