Author
Abstract
The location at which species are observed can be uncertain, for example in fisheries where catch is recorded accurately but location is coarse or inaccurate. This positional uncertainty can bias ecological inference and hinder management decisions that rely on spatially precise data. In such cases, spatial signals in observed species compositions can help identify and refine uncertain locations. This study explored three approaches for estimating location from species compositions: 1) a hierarchical species distribution model (SDM) that jointly estimates species distributions and location uncertainty, 2) an inverse prediction method that uses a fitted SDM to identify the most likely location given new species data, and 3) the direct modelling of location as the response variable. Each approach requires a subset of accurate locations to quantify the spatial patterns in species distributions. All three methods were useful and reasonably accurate: for the simulated data the average distance error was 15% the size of the domain, and for the real data this error was 20–100 km. When only some locations are uncertain, the hierarchical approach is valuable due to its integrated estimation of location and species parameters. When many locations are uncertain, the other approaches seem more suitable. Inverse prediction is ideal when prior information is available to constrain estimation. Direct modelling (although causally spurious) is well suited to large datasets, with multivariate random forests often estimating location most accurately. These methods can enhance spatial data quality in ecological monitoring and help develop tools for improving inaccurate or deliberately misreported fishing locations.
Suggested Citation
Smith, James A., 2026.
"Methods for estimating location from spatial patterns in species composition: a fishing location case study,"
Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 516(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:516:y:2026:i:c:s0304380026000669
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2026.111537
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:516:y:2026:i:c:s0304380026000669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.