IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v514y2026ics0304380026000244.html

Mapping ecosystem services trade-offs as a decision tool for comprehensive ecological land-use planning

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Ke
  • Vatankhah, Sepideh
  • Li, Zhong-Wei

Abstract

Comprehensive ecological land-use (LU) planning is inherently multi-objective, as it requires the assessment of spatial development suitability across three core objectives: food security, ecological security, and living space. This process involves a complex many-to-many matching problem between two interacting components: multi-suitable land covers (LCs) and competing LU demands. To address this challenge, this study introduces the Mapping Ecosystem Services Trade-offs (MEST) framework, a novel spatial approach designed to resolve such many-to-many relationships. The framework is grounded in nonlinear scientific thinking, which emphasizes relational understanding of complex phenomena, and integrates this perspective with spatial mapping techniques. Specifically, MEST leverages ecosystem services (ES) trade-offs and cascade relationships through a divergent reasoning approach tailored to complex spatial interactions. Eight essential ES are quantified and spatially mapped, both individually and interactively, at a socially relevant scale using a monetary valuation method. Autocorrelation, correlation, and clustering analyses are then employed to identify six distinct socio-ecological subsystems: the Food Provisioning Zone, Eco-Protection Zone, Eco-Transition Zone, Urban Tourism Zone, Ecologically Vulnerable Zone, and Ecological Harmony Zone. Each subsystem represents an area in which ecosystem functions do not produce counterbalancing or mutually constraining effects. Based on these results, three strategic principles are proposed to restructure production, living, and ecological spaces in Khorasan, guiding the spatial delineation of Agricultural Production Areas, Urban Construction Areas, and Ecological Protection Areas. This work addresses a persistent challenge in sustainable development—reconciling competing LUs without diminishing the supply or resilience of vital ES. Overall, the MEST framework demonstrates strong potential for resolving LU conflicts through a simple yet effective algorithm, offering a practical and relationship-oriented approach to sustainable LU management.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Ke & Vatankhah, Sepideh & Li, Zhong-Wei, 2026. "Mapping ecosystem services trade-offs as a decision tool for comprehensive ecological land-use planning," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 514(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:514:y:2026:i:c:s0304380026000244
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2026.111496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380026000244
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2026.111496?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Groot, Rudolf & Brander, Luke & van der Ploeg, Sander & Costanza, Robert & Bernard, Florence & Braat, Leon & Christie, Mike & Crossman, Neville & Ghermandi, Andrea & Hein, Lars & Hussain, Salman & , 2012. "Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 50-61.
    2. Wang, Danyang & Wang, Mingshu & Zheng, Wei & Song, Yaya & Huang, Xianjin, 2025. "A multi-level spatial assessment framework for identifying land use conflict zones," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Terence Lee & Lauren O’Mahony & Pia Lebeck, 2023. "Introduction: Creativity, Innovation and Everyday Dynamics," Springer Books, in: Creativity and Innovation, chapter 0, pages 1-12, Springer.
    4. Pham, Kien T. & Lin, Tang-Huang, 2023. "Effects of urbanisation on ecosystem service values: A case study of Nha Trang, Vietnam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    5. Turkelboom, Francis & Leone, Michael & Jacobs, Sander & Kelemen, Eszter & García-Llorente, Marina & Baró, Francesc & Termansen, Mette & Barton, David N. & Berry, Pam & Stange, Erik & Thoonen, Marijke , 2018. "When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PC), pages 566-578.
    6. González-García, Alberto & Palomo, Ignacio & González, José A. & López, César A. & Montes, Carlos, 2020. "Quantifying spatial supply-demand mismatches in ecosystem services provides insights for land-use planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    7. Ghasemi, Mitra & Charrahy, Zabih & González-García, Alberto, 2023. "Mapping cultural ecosystem services provision: An integrated model of recreation and ecotourism opportunities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    8. Han, Bo & Jin, Xiaobin & Sun, Rui & Li, Hanbing & Liang, Xinyuan & Zhou, Yinkang, 2023. "Understanding land-use sustainability with a systematical framework: An evaluation case of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    9. Obaid Alotaibi & Eric Pardede, 2019. "Transformation of Schema from Relational Database (RDB) to NoSQL Databases," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-11, November.
    10. Chen, Sha & Chen, Hong & Yang, Runjia & Ye, Yanmei, 2023. "Linking social-ecological management and ecosystem service bundles: Lessons from a peri-urban agriculture landscape," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    11. Xu, Yang & Han, Liyan & Wan, Li & Yin, Libo, 2019. "Dynamic link between oil prices and exchange rates: A non-linear approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Jinsong & Gao, Dongdong & Shi, Wei & Du, Jiayan & Huang, Zhuo & Liu, Buyuan, 2023. "Spatio-temporal changes in ecosystem service value: Evidence from the economic development of urbanised regions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Kubiszewski, Ida & Concollato, Luke & Costanza, Robert & Stern, David I., 2023. "Changes in authorship, networks, and research topics in ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    3. Lovrić, Marko & Torralba, Mario & Orsi, Francesco & Pettenella, Davide & Mann, Carsten & Geneletti, Davide & Plieninger, Tobias & Primmer, Eeva & Hernandez-Morcillo, Monica & Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark & , 2025. "Mind the income gap: Income from wood production exceed income from providing diverse ecosystem services from Europe’s forests," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Das, Manob & Das, Arijit & Saikh, Selim, 2024. "Estimating supply-demand mismatches for optimization of sustainable land use planning in a rapidly growing urban agglomeration (India)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    5. Uta Schirpke & Erich Tasser, 2021. "Trends in Ecosystem Services across Europe Due to Land-Use/Cover Changes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Farina, Georges & Le Coënt, Philippe & Hérivaux, Cécile, 2024. "Do urban environmental inequalities influence demand for nature based solutions?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    7. Shakya, Bandana & Uddin, Kabir & Yi, Shaoliang & Bhatta, Laxmi Dutt & Lodhi, Mahendra Singh & Htun, Naing Zaw & Yang, Yongping, 2021. "Mapping of the ecosystem services flow from three protected areas in the far-eastern Himalayan Landscape: An impetus to regional cooperation," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    8. Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek & Apan, Armando, 2023. "Examining policy−institution−program (PIP) responses against the drivers of ecosystem dynamics. A chronological review (1960–2020) from Nepal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    9. Remme, Roy P. & Meacham, Megan & Pellowe, Kara E. & Andersson, Erik & Guerry, Anne D. & Janke, Benjamin & Liu, Lingling & Lonsdorf, Eric & Li, Meng & Mao, Yuanyuan & Nootenboom, Christopher & Wu, Tong, 2024. "Aligning nature-based solutions with ecosystem services in the urban century," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    10. Chaikaew, Pasicha & Hodges, Alan W. & Grunwald, Sabine, 2017. "Estimating the value of ecosystem services in a mixed-use watershed: A choice experiment approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 228-237.
    11. Qu, Yang & Hooper, Tara & Austen, Melanie C. & Papathanasopoulou, Eleni & Huang, Junling & Yan, Xiaoyu, 2023. "Development of a computable general equilibrium model based on integrated macroeconomic framework for ocean multi-use between offshore wind farms and fishing activities in Scotland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    12. Liu, Duan & Tang, Runcheng & Xie, Jun & Tian, Jingjing & Shi, Rui & Zhang, Kai, 2020. "Valuation of ecosystem services of rice–fish coculture systems in Ruyuan County, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    13. Pan, Ying & Wu, Junxi & Zhang, Yanjie & Zhang, Xianzhou & Yu, Chengqun, 2021. "Simultaneous enhancement of ecosystem services and poverty reduction through adjustments to subsidy policies relating to grassland use in Tibet, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    14. Antonio J. Castro & Cristina Quintas-Soriano & Jodi Brandt & Carla L. Atkinson & Colden V. Baxter & Morey Burnham & Benis N. Egoh & Marina García-Llorente & Jason P. Julian & Berta Martín-López & Feli, 2018. "Applying Place-Based Social-Ecological Research to Address Water Scarcity: Insights for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.
    15. Aibo Jin & Gachen Zhang & Ping Ma & Xiangrong Wang, 2024. "Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in the Chaohu Lake Basin Based on Land-Use Scenario Simulations," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-29, December.
    16. Jie Yang & Jiashuo Zhang & Chenyang Li & Jianhua Gao, 2025. "Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Trade-Offs/Synergies of Land Use Functions at the Township Scale in Special Ecological Functional Zones," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-27, September.
    17. Hackbart, Vivian C.S. & de Lima, Guilherme T.N.P. & dos Santos, Rozely F., 2017. "Theory and practice of water ecosystem services valuation: Where are we going?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 218-227.
    18. Gabriela Scheufele & Sean Pascoe & Rachel Nichols & Greg Smith & Alistair McIlgorm, 2026. "Monetary Accounting of Cultural Ecosystem Services: Recreational Fishing in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 70(1), pages 44-55, January.
    19. Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska, Agata & Olszańska, Agnieszka & Rechciński, Marcin & Tusznio, Joanna & Grodzińska-Jurczak, Małgorzata, 2022. "Divergent or convergent? Prioritization and spatial representation of ecosystem services as perceived by conservation professionals and local leaders," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    20. Nibedita Mukherjee & Jean Huge & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas & Nico Koedam, 2014. "Ecosystem service valuations of mangrove ecosystems to inform decision making and future valuation exercises," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/217963, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:514:y:2026:i:c:s0304380026000244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.