IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v514y2026ics0304380025004508.html

A collaborative, cloud-based decision support system for structured wildfire risk mitigation planning

Author

Listed:
  • Safford, Hugh
  • Miller, Colton
  • Perrot, Danielle
  • Gilbert, Sophie
  • Hoecker, Tyler
  • Koontz, Michael
  • Kornhauser, Kailey
  • Thompson, Matt
  • Shannon, Joe
  • Rutenbeck, Nathan
  • Scott, Joe
  • Conway, Scott
  • Duffy, Katharyn

Abstract

Multi-stakeholder planning and prioritization for ecosystem management and wildfire risk mitigation are complicated by the need to balance a multitude of values, goals, viewpoints, and interests across large landscapes. Doing so requires quantifying current conditions, defining management feasibility constraints, modeling complex system responses under different management and disturbance scenarios, quantifying outcomes in terms of social values, weighing and assessing tradeoffs, and identifying optimal strategies. Beginning in the 2010s, structured wildfire risk assessment tools were developed to provide a framework for prioritizing management actions based on wildfire hazard, ecological response, and decision-maker values. Yet, more than a decade later, operationalizing risk assessments remains challenging and limited by disconnected tooling, static data, and workflows that are difficult to scale or adapt for collaborative decision-making. Here, we present the Vibrant Planet Platform (VPP), a modular, cloud-based decision-support system that integrates fire simulation, ecological response functions, multi-objective optimization, and user input into a unified planning environment. The platform enables risk-based scenario planning across landscapes up to millions of hectares by linking validated modeling tools (e.g., FSim, FVS, ForSys) with high-resolution, up-to-date vegetation and infrastructure data. We describe the challenges inherent to operationalizing risk assessments, demonstrate how VPP addresses them through architectural and methodological design, and highlight real-world deployments in U.S. risk-exposed landscapes and communities. We outline a multi-tiered validation framework for assessing model relevance, internal coherence, predictive performance, and field alignment. VPP illustrates how structured decision-making can be operationalized at broad scales, offering a model for ecological planning tools that are rigorous, transparent, and participatory.

Suggested Citation

  • Safford, Hugh & Miller, Colton & Perrot, Danielle & Gilbert, Sophie & Hoecker, Tyler & Koontz, Michael & Kornhauser, Kailey & Thompson, Matt & Shannon, Joe & Rutenbeck, Nathan & Scott, Joe & Conway, S, 2026. "A collaborative, cloud-based decision support system for structured wildfire risk mitigation planning," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 514(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:514:y:2026:i:c:s0304380025004508
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111464
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025004508
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111464?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scheller, Robert M. & Domingo, James B. & Sturtevant, Brian R. & Williams, Jeremy S. & Rudy, Arnold & Gustafson, Eric J. & Mladenoff, David J., 2007. "Design, development, and application of LANDIS-II, a spatial landscape simulation model with flexible temporal and spatial resolution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 409-419.
    2. Aven, Terje, 2011. "On the new ISO guide on risk management terminology," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 719-726.
    3. Roy, Bernard, 1993. "Decision science or decision-aid science?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 184-203, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sébastien Damart, 2010. "A Cognitive Mapping Approach to Organizing the Participation of Multiple Actors in a Problem Structuring Process," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 505-526, September.
    2. Oliva, Rogelio, 2003. "Model calibration as a testing strategy for system dynamics models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(3), pages 552-568, December.
    3. Zhou, Zaixing & Gustafson, Eric J. & Ollinger, Scott V. & Ouimette, Andrew P. & Miranda, Brian R. & Duveneck, Matthew J. & Foster, Jane R. & Sturtevant, Brian R. & Bronson, Dustin R. & Laflower, Danel, 2025. "Integrating nitrogen and carbon cycling into LANDIS-II/PnET-Succession to improve forest landscape modeling: methods and sensitivity analyses," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 510(C).
    4. Julie Ryschawy & Rodolphe Sabatier & Dominique Vollet, 2016. "Comment sont évalués les systèmes et filières d’élevage. Un focus sur les méthodes et outils. Chapitre 3," Post-Print hal-02799411, HAL.
    5. Scheller, Robert & Kretchun, Alec & Hawbaker, Todd J. & Henne, Paul D., 2019. "A landscape model of variable social-ecological fire regimes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 401(C), pages 85-93.
    6. Tsoukias, Alexis, 2008. "From decision theory to decision aiding methodology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(1), pages 138-161, May.
    7. Seidl, Rupert & Fernandes, Paulo M. & Fonseca, Teresa F. & Gillet, François & Jönsson, Anna Maria & Merganičová, Katarína & Netherer, Sigrid & Arpaci, Alexander & Bontemps, Jean-Daniel & Bugmann, Hara, 2011. "Modelling natural disturbances in forest ecosystems: a review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(4), pages 903-924.
    8. Maria Franca Norese & Diana Rolando & Rocco Curto, 2023. "DIKEDOC: a multicriteria methodology to organise and communicate knowledge," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 1049-1082, June.
    9. Mgiba, Carol & Kolawole, Oladoyin, 2026. "Timber-Support Risk Mitigation Framework (TRF) in underground mining: A mechanistic, cost-benefit and risk assessment approach for artisanal and small-scale mining of critical minerals," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    10. Nikolaos Argyris & Alec Morton & José Rui Figueira, 2014. "CUT: A Multicriteria Approach for Concavifiable Preferences," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(3), pages 633-642, June.
    11. Ager, Alan A. & Barros, Ana M.G. & Day, Michelle A. & Preisler, Haiganoush K. & Spies, Thomas A. & Bolte, John, 2018. "Analyzing fine-scale spatiotemporal drivers of wildfire in a forest landscape model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 384(C), pages 87-102.
    12. Teng, Kuei-Yung & Thekdi, Shital A. & Lambert, James H., 2012. "Identification and evaluation of priorities in the business process of a risk or safety organization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 74-86.
    13. Ormerod, Richard J. & Ulrich, Werner, 2013. "Operational research and ethics: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(2), pages 291-307.
    14. Greco, Salvatore, 1997. "A new PCCA method: IDRA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 587-601, May.
    15. Conlisk, Erin & Syphard, Alexandra D. & Franklin, Janet & Regan, Helen M., 2015. "Predicting the impact of fire on a vulnerable multi-species community using a dynamic vegetation model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 301(C), pages 27-39.
    16. Doumpos, Michael & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2011. "Preference disaggregation and statistical learning for multicriteria decision support: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 209(3), pages 203-214, March.
    17. Alexis Tsoukiàs, 2007. "On the concept of decision aiding process: an operational perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 3-27, October.
    18. Barbati, Maria & Greco, Salvatore & Lami, Isabella M., 2024. "The Deck-of-cards-based Ordinal Regression method and its application for the development of an ecovillage," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 319(3), pages 845-861.
    19. Maciej Urbaniak & Dominik Zimon & Peter Madzik & Eva Šírová, 2022. "Risk factors in the assessment of suppliers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-21, August.
    20. Moreno-Jiménez, José María & Polasek, Wolfgang, 2003. "E-Democracy and Knowledge. A Multicriteria Framework for the New Democratic Era," Economics Series 142, Institute for Advanced Studies.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:514:y:2026:i:c:s0304380025004508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.