IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v513y2026ics030438002500403x.html

A participatory system dynamics approach to assess transboundary nutrient pollution: modelling the water-energy-food-ecosystems nexus in the Lielupe River Basin, Lithuania and Latvia

Author

Listed:
  • Amorocho-Daza, Henry
  • Sušnik, Janez
  • Slinger, Jill H.
  • van der Zaag, Pieter

Abstract

Managing natural resources in transboundary river basins is a complex task in which societal needs and environmental impact are intertwined. The nexus paradigm engages with such a challenge by analysing synergies and trade-offs across Water-Energy-Food-Ecosystems (WEFE) sectors. We present a WEFE nexus operationalisation using a participatory modelling approach in the transboundary Lielupe river basin, shared between Latvia and Lithuania. Using a modelling cycle approach, we illustrate a stakeholder-driven pathway from generic and qualitative to increasingly quantitative system tools useful for basin-scale policy analysis. Stakeholders prioritised agricultural nutrient pollution as a critical nexus issue strongly linked to land-use. Three policy alternatives to address this issue were co-identified with stakeholders from both riparian countries: (i) implementing nature-based solutions; (ii) transitioning to organic agriculture; and (iii) promoting arable land-use transitions to former native landscapes. The long-term effect of such policies is explored using a System Dynamics simulation model. Results highlight the importance of promoting active transboundary cooperation for water quality control, as unilateral action hampers the effect of long-term ambitious policies. Even highly ambitious unilateral action can delay the achievement of river basin quality objectives in the order of a decade, a critical finding for the wider Baltic region and the achievement of EU water quality objectives. Based on an exploratory analysis, we found that implementing basin-scale solutions for nutrient control would reduce nitrogen concentration by around 30 % with a 2 % co-benefit of increasing vegetation stocks, yet at the cost of decreasing cereal production by 8 %. This work illustrates the capabilities of a tailor-made simulation model crafted to answer locally relevant policy questions with a nexus perspective in a transboundary river basin. Developing and using a simulation model in a participatory way can explore policy futures while fostering dialogue among riparian stakeholders. This is a promising way to promote cooperation towards solving critical socio-environmental issues in transboundary rivers.

Suggested Citation

  • Amorocho-Daza, Henry & Sušnik, Janez & Slinger, Jill H. & van der Zaag, Pieter, 2026. "A participatory system dynamics approach to assess transboundary nutrient pollution: modelling the water-energy-food-ecosystems nexus in the Lielupe River Basin, Lithuania and Latvia," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 513(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:513:y:2026:i:c:s030438002500403x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030438002500403X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111417?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Trodahl, Martha I. & Jackson, Bethanna M. & Deslippe, Julie R. & Metherell, Alister K., 2017. "Investigating trade-offs between water quality and agricultural productivity using the Land Utilisation and Capability Indicator (LUCI)–A New Zealand application," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PB), pages 388-399.
    2. Mark Zeitoun & Marisa Goulden & David Tickner, 2013. "Current and future challenges facing transboundary river basin management," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(5), pages 331-349, September.
    3. Amorocho-Daza, Henry & Sušnik, Janez & van der Zaag, Pieter & Slinger, Jill H., 2025. "A model-based policy analysis framework for social-ecological systems: Integrating uncertainty and participation in system dynamics modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 499(C).
    4. Rashidian, Mahla & Tartiu, Valentina Elena & Seifert-Dähnn, Isabel & Nawrath, Maximilian & Barkved, Line Johanne & Blanco-Gómez, Pablo & Rodríguez-Vélez, Marckbyn S., 2025. "Balancing act: A participatory system dynamics approach for Mar Menor’s sustainable future," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 509(C).
    5. van den Heuvel, Lotte & Blicharska, Malgorzata & Masia, Sara & Sušnik, Janez & Teutschbein, Claudia, 2020. "Ecosystem services in the Swedish water-energy-food-land-climate nexus: Anthropogenic pressures and physical interactions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    6. Jose Albiac & Elena Calvo & Encarna Esteban, 2024. "Review Paper: A Quarter of a Century of the European Water Framework Directive — The Slow Path Towards Sustainable Water Management," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(02), pages 1-23, June.
    7. James Salzman & Genevieve Bennett & Nathaniel Carroll & Allie Goldstein & Michael Jenkins, 2018. "The global status and trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(3), pages 136-144, March.
    8. Jianguo Liu & Vanessa Hull & H. Charles J. Godfray & David Tilman & Peter Gleick & Holger Hoff & Claudia Pahl-Wostl & Zhenci Xu & Min Gon Chung & Jing Sun & Shuxin Li, 2018. "Nexus approaches to global sustainable development," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(9), pages 466-476, September.
    9. Sven Wunder & Jan Börner & Driss Ezzine-de-Blas & Sarah Feder & Stefano Pagiola, 2020. "Payments for Environmental Services: Past Performance and Pending Potentials," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 12(1), pages 209-234, October.
    10. Pieter Zaag, 2007. "Asymmetry and Equity in Water Resources Management; Critical Institutional Issues for Southern Africa," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 21(12), pages 1993-2004, December.
    11. Thomas Bernauer & Tobias Böhmelt, 2020. "International conflict and cooperation over freshwater resources," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(5), pages 350-356, May.
    12. Paturu, Pallavi & Varadarajan, Sudhir, 2025. "A system dynamics model to assess the commercial viability of hydroponics product service system," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 510(C).
    13. repec:plo:pone00:0218875 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Michael J. Castellano & Sotirios V. Archontoulis & Matthew J. Helmers & Hanna J. Poffenbarger & Johan Six, 2019. "Sustainable intensification of agricultural drainage," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(10), pages 914-921, October.
    15. Aiko Endo & Kimberly Burnett & Pedcris M. Orencio & Terukazu Kumazawa & Christopher Wada & Akira Ishii & Izumi Tsurita & Makoto Taniguchi, 2015. "Methods of the Water-Energy-Food Nexus," Working Papers 2015-12, University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
    16. F. Y. Cheng & K. J. Van Meter & D. K. Byrnes & N. B. Basu, 2020. "Maximizing US nitrate removal through wetland protection and restoration," Nature, Nature, vol. 588(7839), pages 625-630, December.
    17. Eva-Marie Meemken & Matin Qaim, 2018. "Organic Agriculture, Food Security, and the Environment," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 10(1), pages 39-63, October.
    18. Asmeret Naugle & Saeed Langarudi & Timothy Clancy, 2024. "What is (quantitative) system dynamics modeling? Defining characteristics and the opportunities they create," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(2), April.
    19. Kaddoura, Saeed & El Khatib, Sameh, 2017. "Review of water-energy-food Nexus tools to improve the Nexus modelling approach for integrated policy making," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 114-121.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Xue-Chao & Jiang, Peng & Yang, Lan & Fan, Yee Van & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Wang, Yutao, 2021. "Extended water-energy nexus contribution to environmentally-related sustainable development goals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. Garrett, R.D. & Grabs, J. & Cammelli, F. & Gollnow, F. & Levy, S.A., 2022. "Should payments for environmental services be used to implement zero-deforestation supply chain policies? The case of soy in the Brazilian Cerrado," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    3. Vorlaufer, Tobias & Steimanis, Ivo & Plassenberg, Jan, 2025. "Payment for ecosystem services and crowding of conservation behavior: A meta-analysis of lab-in-the-field experiments," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. P. Bucher, Isabela & N. L. Seixas, Renato, 2026. "Do payments for environmental services impact forest cover? An evaluation of the reflorestar program," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    5. Montoya-Zumaeta, Javier G. & Wunder, Sven & Tacconi, Luca, 2021. "Incentive-based conservation in Peru: Assessing the state of six ongoing PES and REDD+ initiatives," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Zhang, Tong & Tan, Qian & Yu, Xiaoning & Zhang, Shan, 2020. "Synergy assessment and optimization for water-energy-food nexus: Modeling and application," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    7. Benra, F. & Nahuelhual, L. & Felipe-Lucia, M. & Jaramillo, A. & Jullian, C. & Bonn, A., 2022. "Balancing ecological and social goals in PES design – Single objective strategies are not sufficient," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    8. Rashidian, Mahla & Tartiu, Valentina Elena & Seifert-Dähnn, Isabel & Nawrath, Maximilian & Barkved, Line Johanne & Blanco-Gómez, Pablo & Rodríguez-Vélez, Marckbyn S., 2025. "Balancing act: A participatory system dynamics approach for Mar Menor’s sustainable future," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 509(C).
    9. Xin, Sihui & Li, Zhouyuan & Nong, Junsong & Wu, Jiaxin & Zou, Xinwei & Wu, Ruijin & Dong, Shikui & Wu, Rongling & Wang, Shaopeng, 2025. "Environmental system dynamics: Current development and applications," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 506(C).
    10. Manuel Morales-García & Miguel Á. García Rubio, 2024. "Sustainability of an economy from the water-energy-food nexus perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 2811-2835, February.
    11. Bingham, Logan Robert, 2021. "Vittel as a model case in PES discourse: Review and critical perspective," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    12. Yaya Feng & Fanglei Zhong & Chunlin Huang & Juan Gu & Yingchun Ge & Xiaoyu Song, 2020. "Spatiotemporal Distribution and the Driving Force of the Food-Energy-Water Nexus Index in Zhangye, Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Hubert Hirwa & Qiuying Zhang & Yunfeng Qiao & Yu Peng & Peifang Leng & Chao Tian & Sayidjakhon Khasanov & Fadong Li & Alphonse Kayiranga & Fabien Muhirwa & Auguste Cesar Itangishaka & Gabriel Habiyare, 2021. "Insights on Water and Climate Change in the Greater Horn of Africa: Connecting Virtual Water and Water-Energy-Food-Biodiversity-Health Nexus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, June.
    14. Kang, Shiteng & Kroeger, Timm & Shemie, Daniel & Echavarria, Marta & Montalvo, Tamara & Bremer, Leah L. & Bennett, Genevieve & Barreto, Samuel Roiphe & Bracale, Henrique & Calero, Claudia & Cardenas, , 2023. "Investing in nature-based solutions: Cost profiles of collective-action watershed investment programs," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    15. Nguyen, Chi & Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe & Hanley, Nick & Schilizzi, Steven & Iftekhar, Sayed, 2022. "Spatial Coordination Incentives for landscape-scale environmental management: A systematic review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    16. Ding, Qian & Lu, Qiaoling & Wu, Jing & Zhou, Ting & Deng, Jinsong & Kong, Lingqiao & Yang, Wu, 2022. "Integrated assessment of a payment for ecosystem services program in China from the effectiveness, efficiency and equity perspective," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    17. Cássia Juliana Fernandes Torres & Camilla Hellen Peixoto de Lima & Bárbara Suzart de Almeida Goodwin & Terencio Rebello de Aguiar Junior & Andrea Sousa Fontes & Daniel Veras Ribeiro & Rodrigo Saldanha, 2019. "A Literature Review to Propose a Systematic Procedure to Develop “Nexus Thinking” Considering the Water–Energy–Food Nexus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-32, December.
    18. McWherter, Brooke & Bauchet, Jonathan & Ma, Zhao & Grillos, Tara & Asquith, Nigel & Rathjen, Meagan & Markos, Andrea, 2022. "Compliance under control: Insights from an incentive-based conservation program in rural Bolivia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    19. Floor Brouwer & Serena Caucci & Daniel Karthe & Sabrina Kirschke & Kaveh Madani & Andrea Mueller & Lulu Zhang & Edeltraud Guenther, 2023. "Advancing the resource nexus concept for research and practice," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 41-65, December.
    20. Connor, Jeffery D. & Summers, David & Regan, Courtney & Abbott, Hayley & Van Der Linden, Leon & Frizenschaf, Jacqueline, 2022. "Sensitivity analysis in economic evaluation of payments for water and carbon ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:513:y:2026:i:c:s030438002500403x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.