IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v512y2026ics0304380025003886.html

A GIS-based methodology to identify priority areas for land use regulations - Case study of Kozhikode

Author

Listed:
  • Nazer, Nishan
  • P, Bimal
  • K, Chithra

Abstract

Rapid urbanization in Kozhikode district, Kerala, from 2003 to 2023 has significantly altered land use and land cover (LULC), impacting water-related ecosystem services (WES). This study proposed a novel integration of pixel-level coupling coordination degree (CCD) analysis, Random Forest (RF) and geographical detector modeling to examine the complex LULC-WES interactions. The methodology employs high-resolution, multi-source spatial data to identify key LULC conversions driving WES changes and map hotspots (high WES degradation) and coldspots (stable/improved WES) at pixel-level resolution. The results reveal weak to moderate coordination between LULC and WES, with negative impacts concentrated in urbanizing southern coastal areas and Western Ghats foothills, driven by forest-to-agriculture and coconut plantation-to-agriculture conversions. Positive WES contributions stem from retaining coconut plantations and converting to rubber agroforestry systems. This GIS-based decision support system, supported by spatially explicit raster outputs, enables policymakers to design precise land use policies and simulate future scenarios for sustainable urban land management. The approach’s data efficiency and adaptability make it a valuable tool for micro-level land and water management, with potential for future integration of socioeconomic drivers and broader ecosystem services to further optimize urban LULC changes in rapidly developing regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nazer, Nishan & P, Bimal & K, Chithra, 2026. "A GIS-based methodology to identify priority areas for land use regulations - Case study of Kozhikode," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 512(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:512:y:2026:i:c:s0304380025003886
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025003886
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cohen, Joshua G. & Enander, Helen D. & Bassett, Tyler J. & Wilton, Clay M. & Cole-Wick, Ashley A., 2024. "Using GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis to prioritize invasive plant treatment: A creative solution for a pernicious problem," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 495(C).
    2. Bilal, Hazrat & Lahlou, Fatima-Zahra & Al-Ansari, Tareq, 2025. "Land suitability assessment and self-sufficiency evaluation for fodder crop production in a hyper arid environment coupling GIS-based multi-criteria decision making and optimization," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 501(C).
    3. Sugianto Sugianto & Anwar Deli & Edy Miswar & Muhammad Rusdi & Muhammad Irham, 2022. "The Effect of Land Use and Land Cover Changes on Flood Occurrence in Teunom Watershed, Aceh Jaya," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Monna Lysa Teixeira Santana & Vanêssa Lopes de Faria & Samara Martins Barbosa & Milson Evaldo Serafim & Alexandre Uezu & Bruno Montoani Silva & Junior Cesar Avanzi, 2023. "Impacts of Land Use Changes on Soil Functions and Water Security: Insights from a Three-Year-Long Study in the Cantareira System, Southeast of Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Shah Fahad & Sangram Bhanudas Chavan & Akash Ravindra Chichaghare & Appanderanda Ramani Uthappa & Manish Kumar & Vijaysinha Kakade & Aliza Pradhan & Dinesh Jinger & Gauri Rawale & Dinesh Kumar Yadav &, 2022. "Agroforestry Systems for Soil Health Improvement and Maintenance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-25, November.
    6. Ferdinando Villa & Kenneth J Bagstad & Brian Voigt & Gary W Johnson & Rosimeiry Portela & Miroslav Honzák & David Batker, 2014. "A Methodology for Adaptable and Robust Ecosystem Services Assessment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Xinghua Cui & Ning Xu & Wanxu Chen & Guanzheng Wang & Jiale Liang & Sipei Pan & Binqiao Duan, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Variation and Influencing Factors of the Coupling Coordination Degree of Production-Living-Ecological Space in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-26, August.
    8. Bolund, Per & Hunhammar, Sven, 1999. "Ecosystem services in urban areas," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 293-301, May.
    9. Suxiao Li & Hong Yang & Martin Lacayo & Junguo Liu & Guangchun Lei, 2018. "Impacts of Land-Use and Land-Cover Changes on Water Yield: A Case Study in Jing-Jin-Ji, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valencia Torres, Angélica & Tiwari, Chetan & Atkinson, Samuel F., 2021. "Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    2. Zhichao Li & Tianqu Shao, 2019. "An Improved Ecological Services Valuation Model in Land Use Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Goran Krsnik & Sonia Reyes-Paecke & Keith M. Reynolds & Jordi Garcia-Gonzalo & José Ramón González Olabarria, 2023. "Assessing Relativeness in the Provision of Urban Ecosystem Services: Better Comparison Methods for Improved Well-Being," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Gaodi Xie & Wenhui Chen & Shuyan Cao & Chunxia Lu & Yu Xiao & Changshun Zhang & Na Li & Shuo Wang, 2014. "The Outward Extension of an Ecological Footprint in City Expansion: The Case of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-16, December.
    5. P. Hlaváčková & D. Šafařík, 2016. "Quantification of the utility value of the recreational function of forests from the aspect of valuation practice," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(8), pages 345-356.
    6. Alexander V. Rusanov, 2019. "Dacha dwellers and gardeners: garden plots and second homes in Europe and Russia," Population and Economics, ARPHA Platform, vol. 3(1), pages 107-124, April.
    7. Hui, Ling Chui & Jim, C.Y., 2022. "Urban-greenery demands are affected by perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices, and socio-demographic and environmental-cultural factors," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Monika Kopecká & Daniel Szatmári & Konštantín Rosina, 2017. "Analysis of Urban Green Spaces Based on Sentinel-2A: Case Studies from Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Veerkamp, Clara J. & Schipper, Aafke M. & Hedlund, Katarina & Lazarova, Tanya & Nordin, Amanda & Hanson, Helena I., 2021. "A review of studies assessing ecosystem services provided by urban green and blue infrastructure," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    10. Lingge Zhang & Ningke Hu, 2021. "Spatial Variation and Terrain Gradient Effect of Ecosystem Services in Heihe River Basin over the Past 20 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-26, October.
    11. Karuppanan Ramasamy Ramesh & Harshavardhan Krishnarao Deshmukh & Karthikeyan Sivakumar & Vipan Guleria & Rathod Digvijaysinh Umedsinh & Nathakrishnan Krishnakumar & Alagesan Thangamalar & Kathirvel Su, 2023. "Influence of Eucalyptus Agroforestry on Crop Yields, Soil Properties, and System Economics in Southern Regions of India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    12. Ahmet Tolunay & Çağlar Başsüllü, 2015. "Willingness to Pay for Carbon Sequestration and Co-Benefits of Forests in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-27, March.
    13. Vasileios A. Tzanakakis & Andrea G. Capodaglio & Andreas N. Angelakis, 2023. "Insights into Global Water Reuse Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-30, August.
    14. Massoni, Emma Soy & Barton, David N. & Rusch, Graciela M. & Gundersen, Vegard, 2018. "Bigger, more diverse and better? Mapping structural diversity and its recreational value in urban green spaces," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 502-516.
    15. Somajita Paul & Harini Nagendra, 2017. "Factors Influencing Perceptions and Use of Urban Nature: Surveys of Park Visitors in Delhi," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-23, April.
    16. Ammara Saleem & Asma Zulfiqar & Baber Ali & Manal Ahmed Naseeb & Arwa Saad Almasaudi & Steve Harakeh, 2022. "Iron Sulfate (FeSO 4 ) Improved Physiological Attributes and Antioxidant Capacity by Reducing Oxidative Stress of Oryza sativa L. Cultivars in Alkaline Soil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Mia, Shamim & Tabassum Roja, Nawshin & Sattar, Md Abdus & Ahmed, Rayhan & Bhuyan, Md Isfatuzzaman & Islam, Md Rafiqul & Badhan, Aparajita & Hasan, Md Kamrul, 2025. "Prioritizing climate-smart agricultural technologies for coastal Bangladesh: A multicriteria assessment," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    18. Bo Yang & Ming-Han Li & Shujuan Li, 2013. "Design-with-Nature for Multifunctional Landscapes: Environmental Benefits and Social Barriers in Community Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-26, October.
    19. Dennis, Matthew & James, Philip, 2017. "Ecosystem services of collectively managed urban gardens: Exploring factors affecting synergies and trade-offs at the site level," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PA), pages 17-26.
    20. Gregg C. Brill & Pippin M. L. Anderson & Patrick O’Farrell, 2022. "Relational Values of Cultural Ecosystem Services in an Urban Conservation Area: The Case of Table Mountain National Park, South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-28, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:512:y:2026:i:c:s0304380025003886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.