Author
Listed:
- Gold, Harriet M.
- Hannam, Jacqueline A.
- Potts, Simon G.
- Brittain, Claire
- Galic, Nika
- Johnston, Alice S.A.
Abstract
Ecological models can support land management decisions and optimisation schemes that need to account for invertebrate population responses at the field to landscape level. However, models that incorporate greater biological detail (e.g. individual-level physiological and behavioural responses) often become computationally intractable at larger spatial extents. Such trade-offs in model development lead to ad hoc model design for different species and management questions, hindering generalisable insights needed to advance predictive ecological models for decision support. To facilitate model comparison, we developed and applied a novel approach to quantify the biological realism of models for two functionally important invertebrate groups commonly targeted by management interventions. Mechanistic and process-based population models for earthworms (n = 23) and wild pollinators (n = 24) were identified through a structured review. We find that earthworm models are predominantly non-spatial or micro-scale (<10 m extent) and often incorporate detailed physiological mechanisms. Pollinator models frequently simulate landscape-scale scenarios (≥1 km extent) and typically rely on aggregated processes to predict population dynamics or crop visitation rates, although some include detailed individual-level movement behaviours. Species- and scale-specific model structures highlight the need for greater integration of physiological and behavioural mechanisms across broader spatial extents. We recommend systematic strategies to build on the progress made by existing models, aiming to resolve the trade-off between realism and tractability for more informed population predictions at management-relevant spatial scales. Our framework complements existing efforts towards greater transparency in model development, communication, and application for robust environmental decision support.
Suggested Citation
Gold, Harriet M. & Hannam, Jacqueline A. & Potts, Simon G. & Brittain, Claire & Galic, Nika & Johnston, Alice S.A., 2026.
"Evaluating biological realism in ecological modelling: application of a novel framework to compare mechanistic and process-based earthworm and wild pollinator population models,"
Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 512(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:512:y:2026:i:c:s0304380025003850
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111399
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:512:y:2026:i:c:s0304380025003850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.