IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v512y2026ics0304380025003837.html

Contrasting vegetation responses to drought indicated by model simulations

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Junping
  • Xue, Baolin
  • Wang, Guoqiang
  • Fang, Qingqing

Abstract

With the extension of drought areas, decreasing soil moisture (SM) induces plant water stress and limits land evapotranspiration, and the sensitivity of land ecological systems may change. The changing climate and corresponding vegetation responses challenge the simulation and forecasting capabilities of Land Surface Models (LSMs). We combine FLUXNET data and the Community Land Model (CLM5.0) to analyse energy fluxes and gross primary productivity (GPP) at sites experiencing long-term and flash droughts across diverse climate and vegetation types. Overall, latent heat flux (LE) was underestimated, whereas GPP was underestimated at arid sites and overestimated at wet sites. The plant hydraulic stress module in CLM5.0 underestimates the soil water stress threshold in arid areas and overestimates the threshold in humid areas. On this basis, we derive a quantitative function. The model performed worst for annual LE, H and GPP at arid sites because of cumulative soil moisture errors. Further analysis revealed that LE and GPP were underestimated during the middle of the growing season because of exaggerated midday stomatal closure. Among the various vegetation types, the model performed best for evergreen broadleaf forests and worst for croplands. Contrasting responses to drought were observed across different vegetation types. We used power functions to quantify this process. Forests exhibited greater resilience due to stable physiological traits while grasslands and croplands exhibited greater sensitivity. The capacity for post-drought recovery varies substantially across vegetation types—a critical dynamic that remains poorly captured by the model, particularly for grasslands. This finding was consistently validated across multiple climate scenarios, including SSP1–2.6, SSP2–4.5, and SSP3–7.0. These findings highlight the critical role of land surface processes and provides insights for enhancing model parameterizations to better capture the complexities of plant-atmosphere interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Junping & Xue, Baolin & Wang, Guoqiang & Fang, Qingqing, 2026. "Contrasting vegetation responses to drought indicated by model simulations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 512(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:512:y:2026:i:c:s0304380025003837
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025003837
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111397?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:512:y:2026:i:c:s0304380025003837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.