Author
Abstract
Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a potent greenhouse gas contributing to global warming. Numerous models have been developed and widely applied to simulate long-term N2O emissions at large scales, particularly within agroecosystems. This review systematically evaluated the current state of modelling approaches for simulating N2O emissions. 15 empirical models were categorized into two groups, and the limitations and targeted improvements of each group were discussed. Among the 73 process-based models reviewed, 51 models partition N2O from nitrification using a constant value or a fixed parameter within a range of 0.0003–0.2. Similarly, 16 models partition N2O from denitrification with a constant value or fixed parameter ranging from 0.002 to 0.9. These ranges are narrower than those reported in previous studies. Future research is needed to accurately quantify these ranges and categorize values based on climate, soil properties, and crops. 8 of the collected process-based models simulate N2O through a sequential nitrate reduction approach, while 27 models apply a partitioning ratio for N2O from denitrification. Both strategies rely on soil environmental factors (e.g., soil nitrogen, carbon, soil temperature, moisture, and pH), which are typically derived from small site-specific datasets. Future large meta-analyses could help develop more robust equations that better represent the effects of environmental factors on N2O emissions from denitrification. This review highlighted that despite differences in structure, most models share common strategies for simulating N2O emissions.
Suggested Citation
Wang, Cong & Ruf, Thorsten, 2026.
"A comprehensive review of approaches, challenges, and future directions for advancing nitrous oxide emission modeling,"
Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 512(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:512:y:2026:i:c:s0304380025003825
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111396
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:512:y:2026:i:c:s0304380025003825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.