Author
Listed:
- Kininmonth, Stuart
- Steinitz, Carl
Abstract
Implementing marine reserves that restrict harmful activities requires careful planning across multiple scales and analytical complexities to be effective. However, many processes, such as larval dispersal, and concepts, like trophic interactions, are encapsulated in models that influence reserve planning but are applicable only at limited scales and specific levels of complexity. A critical question arises: which design approach for model development should be chosen for the specific problem at hand? The design principles that define the boundaries of an individual reserve may not necessarily apply at regional scales. We believe that as the planning scale shifts from regional to local, the focus of design decisions transitions from strategy to tactics and then to detailed considerations. Similarly, designing a reserve for a local reef involves a lower level of analytical complexity than creating an interconnected regional reserve system. Process models, such as direct, thematic, vertical, horizontal, hierarchical, temporal, adaptive, and behavioral, inform the decision-making process at progressively higher levels of complexity. As the scale increases and the associated risk of failure grows, the analytical methods employed must incorporate more complex models. In this context, we present a conceptual framework for marine ecological modelers that acknowledges the roles of scale and complexity within the conservation planning process. The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and the contrasting Philippines reserve network highlights the impact of scale and complexity on planning success.
Suggested Citation
Kininmonth, Stuart & Steinitz, Carl, 2026.
"On scale and complexity in model design for marine reserve planning with Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and Philippines case studies,"
Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 512(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:512:y:2026:i:c:s0304380025003813
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111395
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:512:y:2026:i:c:s0304380025003813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.