IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v510y2025ics0304380025003357.html

Comparison of marginal and mixed-effects complementary log-log regression models for predicting planted silver birch mortality

Author

Listed:
  • Siipilehto, Jouni
  • Lee, Daesung

Abstract

Mortality is a key process in forest succession, yet modelling individual tree mortality presents significant challenges. In this study, tree mortality models for silver birch (Betula pendula Roth.) were developed to address these complexities. The modelling data comprised thinning trials for planted silver birch established between 1981 and 1991 in southern and central Finland. Thirteen experiments were established on former agricultural land and eight experiments were on forest land. The test data comprised planted silver birch stands of a spacing trial established on agricultural land in the early 1970s. The modelling options included four different types of models based on different random effect structures: a marginal model without random effects, a random site as RND_SITE, a random plot nested within the site designated as RND_PLOT(SITE), and a random year nested within the site designated as RND_YEAR(SITE) in a linear mixed-effects complementary log-log (CLL) regression. The CLL models were evaluated according to fit statistics, with the RND_YEAR(SITE) model demonstrating the best results. Furthermore, all mortality models were implemented into the MOTTI simulator to evaluate the development of planted silver birch stands in terms of stem number (N, trees ha−1) and stand basal area (G, m2 ha−1). In the MOTTI evaluation, unthinned stands were selected, and the data were divided into density groups: initially dense (N > 2000 trees ha−1), normal density stands (1000 trees ha−1 ≤ N ≤ 2000 trees ha−1), and sparse stands (N < 1000 trees ha−1). The independent dataset demonstrated optimal performance with the RND_YEAR(SITE) model. The current MOTTI model performed generally well but underestimated N and G for the normal density stands compared to the new model options. Finally, when examining the compatibility of the RND_YEAR(SITE) model with the existing and recently introduced stand self-thinning models, the recent model demonstrated high compatibility, while the existing model showed a clear underestimation.

Suggested Citation

  • Siipilehto, Jouni & Lee, Daesung, 2025. "Comparison of marginal and mixed-effects complementary log-log regression models for predicting planted silver birch mortality," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 510(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:510:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025003357
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025003357
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111349?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:510:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025003357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.