IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v510y2025ics0304380025003229.html

Fishing effort displacement drives ecosystem impacts within and beyond marine protected areas

Author

Listed:
  • Binch, Logan
  • Poos, Jan Jaap
  • van de Wolfshaar, Karen

Abstract

Anthropogenic pressures associated with fishing activities, although highly regulated, are deleterious to the natural functioning of marine ecosystems. The establishment of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) is often used as a strategy to alleviate pressures faced by vulnerable species and habitats. Current approaches overlook the interconnectedness of species in the wider ecosystem context, governed by food web dynamic processes. There is a growing recognition of the importance of adopting Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management (EBFM) strategies to ensure the resilience and sustainability of marine ecosystems. Our research utilises a North Sea food web model to test MPA designations in the context of potential changes to the distribution of bottom trawl fishing effort. We investigate three different fishing scenarios and consider, not only the impacts on target species, but also the effects that emerge from food web dynamic interactions at the ecosystem level. Our findings show that reducing bottom trawl fishing effort generally leads to increased biomass and greater typical length, particularly inside and adjacent to MPAs. Impacts extend beyond just target species with indirect effects observed for pelagic species, driven by cascading food web interactions. Protected, Endangered, and Threatened (PET) species responses to MPA implementation are limited but remain positive. From a fisheries perspective, total catch is maximised when fishing effort is proportionally redistributed across active fishing grounds rather than concentrated at MPA boundaries. At the ecosystem level, reduced fishing effort is associated with an increase in community mean mature trophic level and a flattening of the size-spectra slope. Collectively, our findings highlight that while fishing effort management can deliver ecological benefits, spatial closures alone may be insufficient if effort is merely redistributed rather than reduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Binch, Logan & Poos, Jan Jaap & van de Wolfshaar, Karen, 2025. "Fishing effort displacement drives ecosystem impacts within and beyond marine protected areas," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 510(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:510:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025003229
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025003229
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111336?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brochier, Timothée & Auger, Pierre & Thiam, Ndiaga & Sow, Momar & Diouf, Sidiya & Sloterdijk, Hans & Brehmer, Patrice, 2015. "Implementation of artificial habitats: Inside or outside the marine protected areas? Insights from a mathematical approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 297(C), pages 98-106.
    2. Dahmouni, Ilyass & Sumaila, Rashid U., 2023. "A dynamic game model for no-take marine reserves," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 481(C).
    3. Vassallo, P. & Paoli, C. & Buonocore, E. & Franzese, P.P. & Russo, G.F. & Povero, P., 2017. "Assessing the value of natural capital in marine protected areas: A biophysical and trophodynamic environmental accounting model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 355(C), pages 12-17.
    4. repec:plo:pone00:0073922 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Duboz, Raphaël & Versmisse, David & Travers, Morgane & Ramat, Eric & Shin, Yunne-Jai, 2010. "Application of an evolutionary algorithm to the inverse parameter estimation of an individual-based model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(5), pages 840-849.
    6. Riley, Tanya G & Mouat, Beth & Shucksmith, Rachel, 2024. "Real world data for real world problems: Importance of appropriate spatial resolution modelling to inform decision makers in marine management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 498(C).
    7. Froese, R. & Pauly, D. (eds.), 2000. "FishBase 2000: Concepts, designs and data sources," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 13988, April.
    8. Travers, M. & Shin, Y.-J. & Jennings, S. & Machu, E. & Huggett, J.A. & Field, J.G. & Cury, P.M., 2009. "Two-way coupling versus one-way forcing of plankton and fish models to predict ecosystem changes in the Benguela," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(21), pages 3089-3099.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xing, Lei & Zhang, Chongliang & Chen, Yong & Shin, Yunne-Jai & Verley, Philippe & Yu, Haiqing & Ren, Yiping, 2017. "An individual-based model for simulating the ecosystem dynamics of Jiaozhou Bay, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 360(C), pages 120-131.
    2. Hill Cruz, Mariana & Frenger, Ivy & Getzlaff, Julia & Kriest, Iris & Xue, Tianfei & Shin, Yunne-Jai, 2022. "Understanding the drivers of fish variability in an end-to-end model of the Northern Humboldt Current System," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 472(C).
    3. Ibrahima DIEDHIOU & Salimata DIAGNE & Ndiaga THIAM & Coumba DIOP & Gabriel NDIAYE & Fambaye SOW & Aissatou NDOYE, 2018. "Optimization of Sampling of Small Pelagic Fishes in the Exclusive Economic Zone of Senegal under the Climate Impact," Journal of Mathematics Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(4), pages 107-115, August.
    4. Nikodinoska, Natasha & Paletto, Alessandro & Pastorella, Fabio & Granvik, Madeleine & Franzese, Pier Paolo, 2018. "Assessing, valuing and mapping ecosystem services at city level: The case of Uppsala (Sweden)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 411-424.
    5. Giovanni Strona & Pieter S. A. Beck & Mar Cabeza & Simone Fattorini & François Guilhaumon & Fiorenza Micheli & Simone Montano & Otso Ovaskainen & Serge Planes & Joseph A. Veech & Valeriano Parravicini, 2021. "Ecological dependencies make remote reef fish communities most vulnerable to coral loss," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Paolo Vassallo & Claudia Turcato & Ilaria Rigo & Claudia Scopesi & Andrea Costa & Matteo Barcella & Giulia Dapueto & Mauro Mariotti & Chiara Paoli, 2021. "Biophysical Accounting of Forests’ Value under Different Management Regimes: Conservation vs. Exploitation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Caracappa, Joseph C. & Beet, Andrew & Gaichas, Sarah & Gamble, Robert J. & Hyde, Kimberly J.W. & Large, Scott I. & Morse, Ryan E. & Stock, Charles A. & Saba, Vincent S., 2022. "A northeast United States Atlantis marine ecosystem model with ocean reanalysis and ocean color forcing," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 471(C).
    8. Haythorne, Sean & Skabar, Andrew, 2013. "An improved pattern-guided evolution approach for the development of adaptive individual-based ecological models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 72-82.
    9. Kumar, Vijay & Kumari, Beena, 2015. "Mathematical modelling of the seasonal variability of plankton and forage fish in the Gulf of Kachchh," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 237-250.
    10. Zhang, Can & Su, Bo & Beckmann, Michael & Volk, Martin, 2024. "Emergy-based evaluation of ecosystem services: Progress and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    11. Frank, A.S. & Pinke, Andrea & Read, Elizabeth & Röblitz, Susanna & Sadhu, Susmita & Subbey, Sam, 2025. "Exploring multistability in marine ecosystems: Insights from food web model dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 508(C).
    12. Berrios, Fernando & Campbell, Daniel E. & Ortiz, Marco, 2017. "Emergy evaluation of benthic ecosystems influenced by upwelling in northern Chile: Contributions of the ecosystems to the regional economy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 359(C), pages 146-164.
    13. Guichard, S. & Kriticos, D.J. & Kean, J.M. & Worner, S.P., 2010. "Modelling pheromone anemotaxis for biosecurity surveillance: Moth movement patterns reveal a downwind component of anemotaxis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(23), pages 2801-2807.
    14. Mattei, F. & Buonocore, E. & Franzese, P.P. & Scardi, M., 2021. "Global assessment of marine phytoplankton primary production: Integrating machine learning and environmental accounting models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 451(C).
    15. Buonocore, Elvira & Appolloni, Luca & Russo, Giovanni F. & Franzese, Pier Paolo, 2020. "Assessing natural capital value in marine ecosystems through an environmental accounting model: A case study in Southern Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 419(C).
    16. Grüss, Arnaud & Palomares, Maria L.D. & Poelen, Jorrit H. & Barile, Josephine R. & Aldemita, Casey D. & Ortiz, Shelumiel R. & Barrier, Nicolas & Shin, Yunne-Jai & Simons, James & Pauly, Daniel, 2019. "Building bridges between global information systems on marine organisms and ecosystem models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 398(C), pages 1-19.
    17. Capriolo, A. & Boschetto, R.G. & Mascolo, R.A. & Balbi, S. & Villa, F., 2020. "Biophysical and economic assessment of four ecosystem services for natural capital accounting in Italy," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    18. Chiara Paoli & Paolo Povero & Ilaria Rigo & Giulia Dapueto & Rachele Bordoni & Paolo Vassallo, 2022. "Two Sides of the Same Coin: A Theoretical Framework for Strong Sustainability in Marine Protected Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Schwamborn, R. & Mildenberger, T.K. & Taylor, M.H., 2019. "Assessing sources of uncertainty in length-based estimates of body growth in populations of fishes and macroinvertebrates with bootstrapped ELEFAN," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 393(C), pages 37-51.
    20. Jeong, Yong Dam & Kim, Sangil & Jung, Il Hyo & Cho, Giphil, 2021. "Optimal harvesting strategy for hairtail, Trichiurus Lepturus, in Korea Sea using discrete-time age-structured model," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 392(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:510:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025003229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.