IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v510y2025ics0304380025003217.html

Simulation of carbon fluxes from Tibetan Plateau grasslands by integrating data assimilation and parameter inversion within the Biome-BGC model

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Jingzhou
  • Zhou, Tao
  • Cao, Li
  • Zeng, Jingyu
  • Zhang, Yajie
  • Zhang, Qi
  • Wu, Xuemei
  • Qu, Yancheng
  • Tan, E.
  • Liu, Xia

Abstract

The Qinghai‒Tibet Plateau (QTP) grassland ecosystem is highly sensitive to climate change, but significant uncertainties caused by model parameters and state variables remain in its simulated carbon fluxes. This study integrates data assimilation and parameter inversion within the Biome-BGC model to improve simulation accuracy. By simultaneously optimizing both model parameters across multiple sites and multiple objectives—including gross primary production (GPP), ecosystem respiration (RECO), soil carbon, and aboveground biomass—as well as key state variables, such as the leaf area index and soil moisture, this approach addresses limitations in the radiation and soil moisture modules of the Biome-BGC for the QTP. At the site scale, the optimized model improved the GPP simulation accuracy, with an average increase of 0.42 in R2 from 0.41 to 0.83 compared with the original model, whereas the RECO simulation accuracy improved, with an average R2 increase of 0.32 from 0.42 to 0.75. The mean carbon sink of Tibetan Plateau grasslands was 41.47 Tg C yr−1 during 2000–2022, with the eastern region acting as a strong carbon sink, whereas the western region presented weaker carbon sinks or carbon sources. Over these 23 years, the QTP has shown a continuous greening trend, partly because the increase in RECO was smaller than that in GPP. This study presents a new model optimization framework for research on carbon neutrality on the QTP.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Jingzhou & Zhou, Tao & Cao, Li & Zeng, Jingyu & Zhang, Yajie & Zhang, Qi & Wu, Xuemei & Qu, Yancheng & Tan, E. & Liu, Xia, 2025. "Simulation of carbon fluxes from Tibetan Plateau grasslands by integrating data assimilation and parameter inversion within the Biome-BGC model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 510(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:510:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025003217
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025003217
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111335?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Argenti, G. & Chiesi, M. & Fibbi, L. & Maselli, F., 2022. "Use of remote sensing and bio-geochemical models to estimate the net carbon fluxes of managed mountain grasslands," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 474(C).
    2. Shilong Piao & Zhuo Liu & Tao Wang & Shushi Peng & Philippe Ciais & Mengtian Huang & Anders Ahlstrom & John F. Burkhart & Frédéric Chevallier & Ivan A. Janssens & Su-Jong Jeong & Xin Lin & Jiafu Mao &, 2017. "Weakening temperature control on the interannual variations of spring carbon uptake across northern lands," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(5), pages 359-363, May.
    3. Hidy, D. & Barcza, Z. & Haszpra, L. & Churkina, G. & Pintér, K. & Nagy, Z., 2012. "Development of the Biome-BGC model for simulation of managed herbaceous ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 99-119.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han, Qifei & Li, Chaofan & Zhao, Chengyi & Zhang, Yaoqi & Li, Shoubo, 2018. "Grazing decreased water use efficiency in Central Asia from 1979 to 2011," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 388(C), pages 72-79.
    2. Li Yu & Fengxue Gu & Mei Huang & Bo Tao & Man Hao & Zhaosheng Wang, 2020. "Impacts of 1.5 °C and 2 °C Global Warming on Net Primary Productivity and Carbon Balance in China’s Terrestrial Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Zhihua Liu & John S. Kimball & Ashley P. Ballantyne & Nicholas C. Parazoo & Wen J. Wang & Ana Bastos & Nima Madani & Susan M. Natali & Jennifer D. Watts & Brendan M. Rogers & Philippe Ciais & Kailiang, 2022. "Respiratory loss during late-growing season determines the net carbon dioxide sink in northern permafrost regions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Song, Xu & Zhou, Zhen & Shen, Ruichang & Xu, Liliang & Hu, Fangqing & Xie, Zeyang & Zhu, Jinqi & Zheng, Bofu & Wan, Wei, 2025. "Evaluating the suitability of NPP simulation for subtropical forest ecosystems by calibrating the Biome-BGC model: An empirical study at interannual and inter-monthly scales," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 509(C).
    5. Mengjie Wang & Shushi Peng & Zihan Lu & Xiangtao Xu & Andrew Felton & Anping Chen, 2025. "Increasing constraint of aridity on tree intrinsic water use efficiency," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Sun, Qingling & Li, Baolin & Zhang, Tao & Yuan, Yecheng & Gao, Xizhang & Ge, Jinsong & Li, Fei & Zhang, Zhijun, 2017. "An improved Biome-BGC model for estimating net primary productivity of alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 350(C), pages 55-68.
    7. Maša Zorana Ostrogović Sever & Zoltán Barcza & Dóra Hidy & Anikó Kern & Doroteja Dimoski & Slobodan Miko & Ozren Hasan & Branka Grahovac & Hrvoje Marjanović, 2021. "Evaluation of the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model Biome-BGCMuSo for Modelling Soil Organic Carbon under Different Land Uses," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    8. Kipling, Richard P. & Bannink, André & Bellocchi, Gianni & Dalgaard, Tommy & Fox, Naomi J. & Hutchings, Nicholas J. & Kjeldsen, Chris & Lacetera, Nicola & Sinabell, Franz & Topp, Cairistiona F.E. & va, 2016. "Modeling European ruminant production systems: Facing the challenges of climate change," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 24-37.
    9. Chaobin Zhang & Ying Zhang & Jianlong Li, 2019. "Grassland Productivity Response to Climate Change in the Hulunbuir Steppes of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-15, November.
    10. Xiaotao Huang & Yongsheng Yang & Chunbo Chen & Hongfei Zhao & Buqing Yao & Zhen Ma & Li Ma & Huakun Zhou, 2022. "Quantifying and Mapping Human Appropriation of Net Primary Productivity in Qinghai Grasslands in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, March.
    11. Kai Wang & Ana Bastos & Philippe Ciais & Xuhui Wang & Christian Rödenbeck & Pierre Gentine & Frédéric Chevallier & Vincent W. Humphrey & Chris Huntingford & Michael O’Sullivan & Sonia I. Seneviratne, 2022. "Regional and seasonal partitioning of water and temperature controls on global land carbon uptake variability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Yanxia Hu & Changqing Wang & Xingxiu Yu & Shengzhou Yin, 2021. "Evaluating Trends of Land Productivity Change and Their Causes in the Han River Basin, China: In Support of SDG Indicator 15.3.1," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Zhang, Wei & Zheng, Xunhua & Li, Siqi & Han, Shenghui & Liu, Chunyan & Yao, Zhisheng & Wang, Rui & Wang, Kai & Chen, Xiao & Yu, Guirui & Chen, Zhi & Wu, Jiabing & Wang, Huimin & Yan, Junhua & Li, Yong, 2025. "Modelling forest-atmosphere exchanges of carbon and water using an improved hydro-biogeochemical model in subtropical and temperate monsoon climates," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 507(C).
    14. Qifei Han & Geping Luo & Chaofan Li & Shoubo Li, 2018. "Response of Carbon Dynamics to Climate Change Varied among Different Vegetation Types in Central Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:510:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025003217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.