IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v510y2025ics0304380025002972.html

Explorers vs. followers: A behavioural approach to spatial bias correction in species distribution modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Guilbault, Emy
  • Somervuo, Panu
  • Renner, Ian

Abstract

In recent years, the increase in data availability through citizen science data collection has raised questions about the quality of this data. Species distribution models can be severely impacted by non-random spatial distributions of records. Multiple methods exist to correct for spatial bias and most of them imply that the sampling is uneven in space and determined by the observers’ choices of where to search for observations. Most methods for addressing sampling biases in opportunistic datasets assume that each observer behaves uniformly, which in practice may not be the case. We focus our study on a widely-used correction method, chosen for its adaptable framework, and assess its effectiveness in mitigating biases from a group of observers with varying behaviours. This method includes a covariate in the model as a bias proxy and corrects for this bias by setting this covariate equal to a constant upon prediction. We differentiate two observer behaviours: exploring and following. Under this paradigm, explorers select destinations far away from the current set of observed points, while followers choose destinations at or near one of the observed points. As such, it is worth investigating whether the current approaches to correcting for observer bias hold under varying observer behaviours, or whether a data-driven approach based on modelled observer behaviour may lead to better predictions. To do so, we developed a new software platform, obsimulator, to simulate patterns of points driven by observer behaviour. We established a correction method based on a bias incorporation approach using k-nearest neighbours. We found that including a bias covariate and setting it to a constant for prediction yields the best results and the strength of the correction differs between cohorts of observers. Additionally, the optimal number of neighbouring points and smoothing parameters depends on the ratio of explorers versus followers in the observers’ cohort.

Suggested Citation

  • Guilbault, Emy & Somervuo, Panu & Renner, Ian, 2025. "Explorers vs. followers: A behavioural approach to spatial bias correction in species distribution modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 510(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:510:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025002972
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025002972
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111311?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:510:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025002972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.