IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v510y2025ics0304380025002972.html

Explorers vs. followers: A behavioural approach to spatial bias correction in species distribution modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Guilbault, Emy
  • Somervuo, Panu
  • Renner, Ian

Abstract

In recent years, the increase in data availability through citizen science data collection has raised questions about the quality of this data. Species distribution models can be severely impacted by non-random spatial distributions of records. Multiple methods exist to correct for spatial bias and most of them imply that the sampling is uneven in space and determined by the observers’ choices of where to search for observations. Most methods for addressing sampling biases in opportunistic datasets assume that each observer behaves uniformly, which in practice may not be the case. We focus our study on a widely-used correction method, chosen for its adaptable framework, and assess its effectiveness in mitigating biases from a group of observers with varying behaviours. This method includes a covariate in the model as a bias proxy and corrects for this bias by setting this covariate equal to a constant upon prediction. We differentiate two observer behaviours: exploring and following. Under this paradigm, explorers select destinations far away from the current set of observed points, while followers choose destinations at or near one of the observed points. As such, it is worth investigating whether the current approaches to correcting for observer bias hold under varying observer behaviours, or whether a data-driven approach based on modelled observer behaviour may lead to better predictions. To do so, we developed a new software platform, obsimulator, to simulate patterns of points driven by observer behaviour. We established a correction method based on a bias incorporation approach using k-nearest neighbours. We found that including a bias covariate and setting it to a constant for prediction yields the best results and the strength of the correction differs between cohorts of observers. Additionally, the optimal number of neighbouring points and smoothing parameters depends on the ratio of explorers versus followers in the observers’ cohort.

Suggested Citation

  • Guilbault, Emy & Somervuo, Panu & Renner, Ian, 2025. "Explorers vs. followers: A behavioural approach to spatial bias correction in species distribution modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 510(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:510:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025002972
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025002972
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111311?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen J. Cornell & Yevhen F. Suprunenko & Dmitri Finkelshtein & Panu Somervuo & Otso Ovaskainen, 2019. "A unified framework for analysis of individual-based models in ecology and beyond," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Boria, Robert A. & Olson, Link E. & Goodman, Steven M. & Anderson, Robert P., 2014. "Spatial filtering to reduce sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 275(C), pages 73-77.
    3. Johnston, Alison & Moran, Nick & Musgrove, Andy & Fink, Daniel & Baillie, Stephen R., 2020. "Estimating species distributions from spatially biased citizen science data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 422(C).
    4. Isa Marques & Thomas Kneib & Nadja Klein, 2022. "Mitigating spatial confounding by explicitly correlating Gaussian random fields," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), August.
    5. Avishek Chakraborty & Alan E. Gelfand & Adam M. Wilson & Andrew M. Latimer & John A. Silander, 2011. "Point pattern modelling for degraded presence‐only data over large regions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 60(5), pages 757-776, November.
    6. Christophe Botella & Alexis Joly & Pascal Monestiez & Pierre Bonnet & François Munoz, 2020. "Bias in presence-only niche models related to sampling effort and species niches: Lessons for background point selection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Peter J. Diggle & Raquel Menezes & Ting‐li Su, 2010. "Geostatistical inference under preferential sampling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(2), pages 191-232, March.
    8. David I Warton & Ian W Renner & Daniel Ramp, 2013. "Model-Based Control of Observer Bias for the Analysis of Presence-Only Data in Ecology," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-9, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christophe Botella & Alexis Joly & Pascal Monestiez & Pierre Bonnet & François Munoz, 2020. "Bias in presence-only niche models related to sampling effort and species niches: Lessons for background point selection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Schartel, Tyler E. & Cao, Yong, 2024. "Background selection complexity influences Maxent predictive performance in freshwater systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 488(C).
    3. D. Simpson & J. B. Illian & F. Lindgren & S. H. Sørbye & H. Rue, 2016. "Going off grid: computationally efficient inference for log-Gaussian Cox processes," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 103(1), pages 49-70.
    4. Philipp Brun & Dirk N. Karger & Damaris Zurell & Patrice Descombes & Lucienne C. Witte & Riccardo Lutio & Jan Dirk Wegner & Niklaus E. Zimmermann, 2024. "Multispecies deep learning using citizen science data produces more informative plant community models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Kendzel, Mitchell J. & de Roode, Jacobus C. & Waller, Lance A., 2025. "Inferring the relative importance of navigation and landscape effects for migratory populations using agent-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 501(C).
    6. B Eugene Smith & Mark K Johnston & Robert Lücking, 2016. "From GenBank to GBIF: Phylogeny-Based Predictive Niche Modeling Tests Accuracy of Taxonomic Identifications in Large Occurrence Data Repositories," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Leandro, Camila & Jay-Robert, Pierre & Mériguet, Bruno & Houard, Xavier & Renner, Ian W., 2020. "Is my sdm good enough? insights from a citizen science dataset in a point process modeling framework," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 438(C).
    8. Ramos, Rodrigo Soares & Kumar, Lalit & Shabani, Farzin & Picanço, Marcelo Coutinho, 2019. "Risk of spread of tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) in tomato crops under various climate change scenarios," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 524-535.
    9. Brian J. Reich & Shu Yang & Yawen Guan & Andrew B. Giffin & Matthew J. Miller & Ana Rappold, 2021. "A Review of Spatial Causal Inference Methods for Environmental and Epidemiological Applications," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(3), pages 605-634, December.
    10. Fourcade, Yoan, 2021. "Fine-tuning niche models matters in invasion ecology. A lesson from the land planarian Obama nungara," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 457(C).
    11. Feng Dong & Chih-Ming Hung & Shou-Hsien Li & Xiao-Jun Yang, 2021. "Potential Himalayan community turnover through the Late Pleistocene," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 1-10, January.
    12. Steen, Bart & Broennimann, Olivier & Maiorano, Luigi & Guisan, Antoine, 2024. "How sensitive are species distribution models to different background point selection strategies? A test with species at various equilibrium levels," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 493(C).
    13. Aubry, Philippe & Francesiaz, Charlotte & Guillemain, Matthieu, 2024. "On the impact of preferential sampling on ecological status and trend assessment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 492(C).
    14. Fernández, Daniel & Nakamura, Miguel, 2015. "Estimation of spatial sampling effort based on presence-only data and accessibility," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 299(C), pages 147-155.
    15. Díaz-Vallejo, Mauricio & Peña-Peniche, Alexander & Mota-Vargas, Claudio & Piña-Torres, Javier & Valencia-Rodríguez, Daniel & Rangel-Rivera, Coral E. & Gaviria-Hernández, Juliana & Rojas-Soto, Octavio, 2024. "Analyses of the variable selection using correlation methods: An approach to the importance of statistical inferences in the modelling process," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 498(C).
    16. Wadkin, Laura E. & Holden, John & Ettelaie, Rammile & Holmes, Melvin J. & Smith, James & Golightly, Andrew & Parker, Nick G. & Baggaley, Andrew W., 2024. "Estimating the reproduction number, R0, from individual-based models of tree disease spread," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 489(C).
    17. Zhang, Shen & Liu, Xin & Tang, Jinjun & Cheng, Shaowu & Qi, Yong & Wang, Yinhai, 2018. "Spatio-temporal modeling of destination choice behavior through the Bayesian hierarchical approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 537-551.
    18. Yoann Bourhis & Alice E. Milne & Chris R. Shortall & Björn Beckman & Dan Blumgart & Rowan Edwards & Luke C. Evans & Chris W. Foster & Richard Fox & Marc S. Botham & Clare Rowland & Stuart Roberts & Ma, 2025. "Trait mediation explains decadal distributional shifts for a wide range of insect taxa," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Dana H. Mills & Michael L. McKinney, 2024. "Climate Change and Jump Dispersal Drive Invasion of the Rosy Wolfsnail ( Euglandina rosea ) in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-14, February.
    20. David I Warton & Ian W Renner & Daniel Ramp, 2013. "Model-Based Control of Observer Bias for the Analysis of Presence-Only Data in Ecology," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-9, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:510:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025002972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.