IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v509y2025ics030438002500242x.html

Simulating tropical forest change using a cellular automata-agent based model

Author

Listed:
  • Zou, Lidong
  • Chen, Jing
  • Wang, Yahui
  • Zhao, Anzhou
  • Dai, Ming
  • Sanchez-Azofeifa, Arturo

Abstract

Traditional Land Use and Cover Change (LUCC) studies have predominantly focused on attribute changes (e.g., forest area, forest change rates, forest types) with limited consideration of the spatial features embedded in dynamic processes. However, LUCC varies across spatial and temporal dimensions in the real world, and these spatial dynamic features are essential in LUCC modeling. Here, we used the spatiotemporal features of LUCC to reproduce and forecast tropical forest changes from 1979 to 2100 in the Guanacaste region using a proposed Cellular Automata-Agent Based Model (CA-AB). The pilot model was validated against historical forest change scenarios. Additionally, this model was used to forecast future scenarios under different assumptions: current trend scenarios, economy-development-driven scenarios, and ecology-protection-driven scenarios. Our results demonstrated that historical simulations for the second period (1997–2015) were more accurate than those for the first period (1979–1997), likely because the extent of forest change (both loss and gain) was greater in the first period, increasing the likelihood of forest changes in random locations. In addition, the simulations of the CA-AB model more closely match the actual forest cover in the second period compared to the CA model alone. This improvement is primarily due to the inclusion of spatial and temporal disparities, particularly those driven by agents' decision behaviors. Besides, simulated forest areas are largest under ecology-protection-driven scenarios, followed by current trend scenarios, with economy-development-driven scenarios having the smallest forest areas. Notably, all three scenarios share a common feature: forest cover concentrates in the peripheral areas of the Guanacaste region, while it declines in the central area over time due to land resource limitations, population growth, and other potential factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Zou, Lidong & Chen, Jing & Wang, Yahui & Zhao, Anzhou & Dai, Ming & Sanchez-Azofeifa, Arturo, 2025. "Simulating tropical forest change using a cellular automata-agent based model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 509(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:509:y:2025:i:c:s030438002500242x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030438002500242X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111256?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cunha, Elias Rodrigues da & Santos, Celso Augusto Guimarães & Silva, Richarde Marques da & Bacani, Vitor Matheus & Pott, Arnildo, 2021. "Future scenarios based on a CA-Markov land use and land cover simulation model for a tropical humid basin in the Cerrado/Atlantic forest ecotone of Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    2. Johannes B. Müller & Philipp E. Geyer & Ana R. Colaço & Peter V. Treit & Maximilian T. Strauss & Mario Oroshi & Sophia Doll & Sebastian Virreira Winter & Jakob M. Bader & Niklas Köhler & Fabian Theis , 2020. "The proteome landscape of the kingdoms of life," Nature, Nature, vol. 582(7813), pages 592-596, June.
    3. Jiang, Xue & Li, Bingxin & Zhao, Hongyu & Zhang, Qiqi & Song, Xiaoya & Zhang, Haoran, 2022. "Examining the spatial simulation and land-use reorganisation mechanism of agricultural suburban settlements using a cellular-automata and agent-based model: Six settlements in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. Mustafa, Ahmed & Cools, Mario & Saadi, Ismaïl & Teller, Jacques, 2017. "Coupling agent-based, cellular automata and logistic regression into a hybrid urban expansion model (HUEM)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 529-540.
    5. Bernardo M. Flores & Encarni Montoya & Boris Sakschewski & Nathália Nascimento & Arie Staal & Richard A. Betts & Carolina Levis & David M. Lapola & Adriane Esquível-Muelbert & Catarina Jakovac & Carlo, 2024. "Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system," Nature, Nature, vol. 626(7999), pages 555-564, February.
    6. Pagiola, Stefano, 2008. "Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(4), pages 712-724, May.
    7. Omer, Abdeen Mustafa, 2008. "Energy, environment and sustainable development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(9), pages 2265-2300, December.
    8. Turner, B. L. II & Meyfroidt, Patrick & Kuemmerle, Tobias & Müller, Daniel & Chowdhury, Rinku Roy, 2020. "Framing the search for a theory of land use," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 15(4), pages 489-508.
    9. Kaimowitz, David, 1995. "Livestock and deforestation in Central America in the 1980s and 1990s: a policy perspective," EPTD discussion papers 9, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. Camille Bann, 1997. "An Economic Analysis of Tropical Forest Land Use Options, Ratanakiri Province, Cambodia," EEPSEA Research Report rr1997112, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), revised Nov 1997.
    11. Lippe, Melvin & Rummel, Lisa & Günter, Sven, 2022. "Simulating land use and land cover change under contrasting levels of policy enforcement and its spatially-explicit impact on tropical forest landscapes in Ecuador," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    12. Pierre Ploton & Frédéric Mortier & Maxime Réjou-Méchain & Nicolas Barbier & Nicolas Picard & Vivien Rossi & Carsten Dormann & Guillaume Cornu & Gaëlle Viennois & Nicolas Bayol & Alexei Lyapustin & Syl, 2020. "Spatial validation reveals poor predictive performance of large-scale ecological mapping models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Lisa M. Campbell, 2002. "Conservation Narratives in Costa Rica: Conflict and Co‐existence," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 33(1), pages 29-56, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Long & Huang, Xianjin & Yang, Hong, 2023. "Optimizing land use patterns to improve the contribution of land use planning to carbon neutrality target," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Edwin Muchapondwa & Jesper Stage & Eric Mungatana & Pushpam Kumar, 2018. "Lessons from Applying Market-Based Incentives in Watershed Management," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(03), pages 1-41, July.
    3. Pacheco, Pablo, 2009. "Agrarian Reform in the Brazilian Amazon: Its Implications for Land Distribution and Deforestation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 1337-1347, August.
    4. Mohammed A. Al-Ghamdi & Khalid S. Al-Gahtani, 2022. "Integrated Value Engineering and Life Cycle Cost Modeling for HVAC System Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-30, February.
    5. Patrick Bottazzi & David Crespo & Harry Soria & Hy Dao & Marcelo Serrudo & Jean Paul Benavides & Stefan Schwarzer & Stephan Rist, 2014. "Carbon Sequestration in Community Forests: Trade-offs, Multiple Outcomes and Institutional Diversity in the Bolivian Amazon," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(1), pages 105-131, January.
    6. Shuaibing Zhang & Kaixu Zhao & Shuoyang Ji & Yafang Guo & Fengqi Wu & Jingxian Liu & Fei Xie, 2022. "Evolution Characteristics, Eco-Environmental Response and Influencing Factors of Production-Living-Ecological Space in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-26, July.
    7. Anna Laura Pisello & Gloria Pignatta & Veronica Lucia Castaldo & Franco Cotana, 2014. "Experimental Analysis of Natural Gravel Covering as Cool Roofing and Cool Pavement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Jeonghwa Cha & Kyungbo Park & Hangook Kim & Jongyi Hong, 2023. "Crisis Index Prediction Based on Momentum Theory and Earnings Downside Risk Theory: Focusing on South Korea’s Energy Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Tang, Rui & Li, Hangxin & Wang, Shengwei, 2019. "A game theory-based decentralized control strategy for power demand management of building cluster using thermal mass and energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 809-820.
    10. Tutar, Halit & Eren, Ömer & Er, Hasan & Gonulal, Erdal & Gokdogan, Osman, 2025. "Field-based experimental greenhouse gas emissions and energy use efficiency study of sorghum x sudan grass hybrid growth in a semi-arid region," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    11. Wang, Jiangjiang & Zhai, Zhiqiang (John) & Jing, Youyin & Zhang, Chunfa, 2010. "Optimization design of BCHP system to maximize to save energy and reduce environmental impact," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 3388-3398.
    12. Anna Barwińska Małajowicz & Miroslava Knapková & Krzysztof Szczotka & Miriam Martinkovičová & Radosław Pyrek, 2022. "Energy Efficiency Policies in Poland and Slovakia in the Context of Individual Well-Being," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-29, December.
    13. David López-Carr, 2021. "A Review of Small Farmer Land Use and Deforestation in Tropical Forest Frontiers: Implications for Conservation and Sustainable Livelihoods," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-23, October.
    14. Mudaca, Joao Daniel & Tsuchiya, Toshiyuki & Yamada, Masaaki & Onwona-Agyeman, Siaw, 2015. "Household participation in Payments for Ecosystem Services: A case study from Mozambique," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 21-27.
    15. Wang, Chengchao & Yang, Yusheng & Zhang, Yaoqi, 2012. "Rural household livelihood change, fuelwood substitution, and hilly ecosystem restoration: Evidence from China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2475-2482.
    16. Adriane Terezinha Schneider & Rosangela Rodrigues Dias & Mariany Costa Deprá & Darissa Alves Dutra & Richard Luan Silva Machado & Cristiano Ragagnin de Menezes & Leila Queiroz Zepka & Eduardo Jacob-Lo, 2024. "The Intersectionality Between Amazon and Commodities Production: A Close Look at Sustainability," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, October.
    17. Xu, Tingting & Gao, Jay & Li, Yuhua, 2019. "Machine learning-assisted evaluation of land use policies and plans in a rapidly urbanizing district in Chongqing, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    18. Pagiola, Stefano & Rios, Ana R. & Arcenas, Agustin, 2008. "Can the poor participate in payments for environmental services? Lessons from the Silvopastoral Project in Nicaragua," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(3), pages 299-325, June.
    19. Deng, Cheng-gang & Chen, Fei, 2021. "Model verification and photo-thermal conversion assessment of a novel facade embedded compound parabolic concentrator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    20. Meng, Xiangmei & de Jong, Wiebren & Kudra, Tadeusz, 2016. "A state-of-the-art review of pulse combustion: Principles, modeling, applications and R&D issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 73-114.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:509:y:2025:i:c:s030438002500242x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.