IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v508y2025ics0304380025001930.html

Improved central place foraging modeling: importance of landscape context and modeling strategies in the case of a French sweat bee

Author

Listed:
  • Glad, A.
  • Moulherat, S.
  • Andrieu, E.
  • Moulherat, M.
  • Sheeren, D.
  • Ouin, A.

Abstract

Insect pollinators, including wild bees, contribute to the pollination of >90 % of wild flowering plants. A realistic simulation of their movements during foraging behaviour is essential to predict their pollination capability. The aim of this study was to develop a new individual based model called SimOïko_CPF to tackle some of the limitations of current models of wild bees’ foraging movement. Its performance was compared with a distance decay model: InVEST crop pollination (InVEST_Poll). For central-based foraging species like wild bees, the SimOïko_CPF model makes it possible to use the SMS algorithm as a support for the movements of individuals during foraging. The SimOïko_CPF model increases the capability to model the interactions between individuals and their landscape components such as physical friction, the attractiveness of floral resources, and collection probability. Sensitivity analysis of the parameterization of the species’ life-history traits performed in this study highlights the importance of two parameters in the landscape visitation: the spatial short-term memory size, and the resource collection probability. The two models were used to simulates the foraging pattern of a small species of wild bee (Lasioglossum marginatum). The outputs of the two models showed similar correlations with the capture data. The comparison between SimOïko_CPF and InVEST_Poll revealed discrepancies in the simulated foraging patterns on virtual landscapes varying in patch size, aggregation and composition. It’s showing that SimOïko_CPF can be use in various heterogenous landscapes and allows the investigation of a large set of parameters including the effect of physical friction and resource attractiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Glad, A. & Moulherat, S. & Andrieu, E. & Moulherat, M. & Sheeren, D. & Ouin, A., 2025. "Improved central place foraging modeling: importance of landscape context and modeling strategies in the case of a French sweat bee," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 508(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:508:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001930
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025001930
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pashanejad, Ehsan & Thierry, Hugo & Robinson, Brian E. & Parrott, Lael, 2023. "The application of semantic modelling to map pollination service provisioning at large landscape scales," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 484(C).
    2. Guy Pe'er & Klaus Henle & Claudia Dislich & Karin Frank, 2011. "Breaking Functional Connectivity into Components: A Novel Approach Using an Individual-Based Model, and First Outcomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(8), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Olsson, Ola & Bolin, Arvid & Smith, Henrik G. & Lonsdorf, Eric V., 2015. "Modeling pollinating bee visitation rates in heterogeneous landscapes from foraging theory," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 316(C), pages 133-143.
    4. An, Li & Grimm, Volker & Sullivan, Abigail & Turner II, B.L. & Malleson, Nicolas & Heppenstall, Alison & Vincenot, Christian & Robinson, Derek & Ye, Xinyue & Liu, Jianguo & Lindkvist, Emilie & Tang, W, 2021. "Challenges, tasks, and opportunities in modeling agent-based complex systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 457(C).
    5. Guus ten Broeke & George van Voorn & Arend Ligtenberg, 2016. "Which Sensitivity Analysis Method Should I Use for My Agent-Based Model?," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 19(1), pages 1-5.
    6. Caroline Wentling & Felipe S. Campos & João David & Pedro Cabral, 2021. "Pollination Potential in Portugal: Leveraging an Ecosystem Service for Sustainable Agricultural Productivity," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    7. Walters, Richard J. & Olsson, Ola & Olsson, Peter & Smith, Henrik G., 2024. "Consequences of intraspecific competition for floral resources in heterogeneous landscapes for eusocial bees," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 496(C).
    8. Mathieu Lihoreau & Nigel E Raine & Andrew M Reynolds & Ralph J Stelzer & Ka S Lim & Alan D Smith & Juliet L Osborne & Lars Chittka, 2012. "Radar Tracking and Motion-Sensitive Cameras on Flowers Reveal the Development of Pollinator Multi-Destination Routes over Large Spatial Scales," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    9. Mathilde Baude & William E. Kunin & Nigel D. Boatman & Simon Conyers & Nancy Davies & Mark A. K. Gillespie & R. Daniel Morton & Simon M. Smart & Jane Memmott, 2016. "Historical nectar assessment reveals the fall and rise of floral resources in Britain," Nature, Nature, vol. 530(7588), pages 85-88, February.
    10. Marchand, Philippe & Harmon-Threatt, Alexandra N. & Chapela, Ignacio, 2015. "Testing models of bee foraging behavior through the analysis of pollen loads and floral density data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 41-49.
    11. Bradley J. Cardinale & J. Emmett Duffy & Andrew Gonzalez & David U. Hooper & Charles Perrings & Patrick Venail & Anita Narwani & Georgina M. Mace & David Tilman & David A. Wardle & Ann P. Kinzig & Gre, 2012. "Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity," Nature, Nature, vol. 486(7401), pages 59-67, June.
    12. Bradley J. Cardinale & J. Emmett Duffy & Andrew Gonzalez & David U. Hooper & Charles Perrings & Patrick Venail & Anita Narwani & Georgina M. Mace & David Tilman & David A.Wardle & Ann P. Kinzig & Gret, 2012. "Correction: Corrigendum: Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity," Nature, Nature, vol. 489(7415), pages 326-326, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joanne Lee Picknoll & Pieter Poot & Michael Renton, 2021. "A New Approach to Inform Restoration and Management Decisions for Sustainable Apiculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Yang Liu & Jing Zhao & Xi Zheng & Xiaoyang Ou & Yaru Zhang & Jiaying Li, 2023. "Evaluation of Biodiversity Maintenance Capacity in Forest Landscapes: A Case Study in Beijing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Yiwei Lian & Yang Bai & Zhongde Huang & Maroof Ali & Jie Wang & Haoran Chen, 2024. "Spatio-Temporal Changes and Habitats of Rare and Endangered Species in Yunnan Province Based on MaxEnt Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Prem Chandra Pandey & Manish Pandey, 2023. "Highlighting the role of agriculture and geospatial technology in food security and sustainable development goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 3175-3195, October.
    5. Guangdong Li & Chuanglin Fang & James E. M. Watson & Siao Sun & Wei Qi & Zhenbo Wang & Jianguo Liu, 2024. "Mixed effectiveness of global protected areas in resisting habitat loss," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Sarah R. Weiskopf & Forest Isbell & Maria Isabel Arce-Plata & Moreno Di Marco & Mike Harfoot & Justin Johnson & Susannah B. Lerman & Brian W. Miller & Toni Lyn Morelli & Akira S. Mori & Ensheng Weng &, 2024. "Biodiversity loss reduces global terrestrial carbon storage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Shuangshuang Liu & Qipeng Liao & Mingzhu Xiao & Dengyue Zhao & Chunbo Huang, 2022. "Spatial and Temporal Variations of Habitat Quality and Its Response of Landscape Dynamic in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Jennifer M. H. Loch & Linda J. Walters & Melinda L. Donnelly & Geoffrey S. Cook, 2021. "Restored Coastal Habitat Can “Reel In” Juvenile Sportfish: Population and Community Responses in the Indian River Lagoon, Florida, USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    9. Jessica Chavez & Vincent Nijman & Desak Ketut Tristiana Sukmadewi & Made Dwi Sadnyana & Sophie Manson & Marco Campera, 2024. "Impact of Farm Management on Soil Fertility in Agroforestry Systems in Bali, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Guangzi Li & Jun Cai, 2022. "Spatial and Temporal Differentiation of Mountain Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs and Synergies: A Case Study of Jieshi Mountain, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Liam Langan & Simon Scheiter & Thomas Hickler & Steven I. Higgins, 2025. "Amazon forest resistance to drought is increased by diversity in hydraulic traits," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Qiujin Chen & Yuqi Zhang & Yin Zhang & Mingliang Kong, 2022. "Examining Social Equity in the Co-Management of Terrestrial Protected Areas: Perceived Fairness of Local Communities in Giant Panda National Park, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Huixin Wang & Jing Xie & Shixian Luo & Duy Thong Ta & Qian Wang & Jiao Zhang & Daer Su & Katsunori Furuya, 2023. "Exploring the Interplay between Landscape Planning and Human Well-Being: A Scientometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, June.
    14. Seyedalireza Seyedi & Elettra Agliardi & Anastasios Xepapadeas, 2025. "Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Solutions in a Dynamic Model of Forest Management," DEOS Working Papers 2549, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    15. Pedro Daleo & Juan Alberti & Enrique J. Chaneton & Oscar Iribarne & Pedro M. Tognetti & Jonathan D. Bakker & Elizabeth T. Borer & Martín Bruschetti & Andrew S. MacDougall & Jesús Pascual & Mahesh Sank, 2023. "Environmental heterogeneity modulates the effect of plant diversity on the spatial variability of grassland biomass," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    16. Gackstetter, David & von Bloh, Malte & Hannus, Veronika & Meyer, Sebastian T. & Weisser, Wolfgang & Luksch, Claudia & Asseng, Senthold, 2023. "Autonomous field management – An enabler of sustainable future in agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    17. Antonia Katharina Ruckli & Sabine Dippel & Nora Durec & Monika Gebska & Jonathan Guy & Juliane Helmerichs & Christine Leeb & Herman Vermeer & Stefan Hörtenhuber, 2021. "Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Pig Farms in Selected European Countries: Combining LCA and Key Performance Indicators for Biodiversity Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    18. CHEN, Running & PENG, Yisong & REN, Qiang & WU, Jiayu, 2025. "Optimizing global protected areas to address future land use threats to biodiversity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    19. Jonathan S. Lefcheck & Graham J. Edgar & Rick D. Stuart-Smith & Amanda E. Bates & Conor Waldock & Simon J. Brandl & Stuart Kininmonth & Scott D. Ling & J. Emmett Duffy & Douglas B. Rasher & Aneil F. A, 2021. "Species richness and identity both determine the biomass of global reef fish communities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    20. Danish A. Ahmed & Sergei V. Petrovskii & Paulo F. C. Tilles, 2018. "The “Lévy or Diffusion” Controversy: How Important Is the Movement Pattern in the Context of Trapping?," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-27, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:508:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.