IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v508y2025ics0304380025001899.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Calibration of the FullCAM model for Australian native vegetation

Author

Listed:
  • Forrester, David I.
  • England, Jacqueline R.
  • Pasut, Chiara
  • Paul, Keryn I.
  • Bennett, Lauren T.
  • Eastaugh, Chris
  • Fairman, Thomas
  • Fedrigo, Melissa
  • Gosper, Carl R.
  • Kasel, Sabine
  • Lewis, Tom
  • Marunda, Crispen
  • Neldner, Victor J.
  • Ngugi, Michael R.
  • O’Donnell, Alison
  • Page, Gerald F.M.
  • Prober, Suzanne M.
  • Richards, Anna E.
  • Suitor, Shaun
  • Volkova, Liubov
  • Weston, Christopher J.
  • Roxburgh, Stephen H.
  • Wang, Ying-Ping

Abstract

The Full Carbon Accounting Model (FullCAM) simulates carbon (C) pools of live biomass, standing dead mass, debris and soil, the flows among them and the atmosphere, and the influences of fire and harvesting disturbances under Australian conditions. It is regularly used by governments, landowners, companies and researchers, at continental, regional and local scales. Recently, FullCAM was calibrated for seven categories of native tropical savanna vegetation. However, for non-savanna native vegetation, calibrated parameters are available for only two general vegetation categories, based on whether the annual rainfall exceeds or falls below 500 mm. These two categories are too broad to capture the large range of growth conditions, vegetation structures and species assemblages that occur across Australia’s native woody vegetation. Here, our objective was to improve FullCAM’s ability to model variation in C pools and post-disturbance recovery among eight native vegetation categories, from shrublands to rainforests, for which there were differences in biomass allocation, litterfall and/or decomposition. To do this, we calibrated FullCAM for each vegetation type, including 14 parameters that were calculated directly from field observations and 17 that were calibrated using a dataset containing about 9300 field plots with measurements of at least one woody vegetation C stock. New parameters (compared with the two general parameter sets) reduced bias from 77 to 25 % (averaged across C stocks), and root mean square error from 44 to 30 Mg C ha-1. Model accuracy could be further improved (i) by focusing on sites with a known disturbance history, (ii) calibrating as many vegetation categories as possible (instead of eight categories generalising across many species), and (iii) adding more detail to growth calculations to quantify factors that may not be adequately represented by FullCAM’s growth equation.

Suggested Citation

  • Forrester, David I. & England, Jacqueline R. & Pasut, Chiara & Paul, Keryn I. & Bennett, Lauren T. & Eastaugh, Chris & Fairman, Thomas & Fedrigo, Melissa & Gosper, Carl R. & Kasel, Sabine & Lewis, Tom, 2025. "Calibration of the FullCAM model for Australian native vegetation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 508(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:508:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001899
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025001899
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111204?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:508:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001899. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.