IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v508y2025ics0304380025001541.html

An analytical solution for optimising multi-species detection surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Newman, Kevin D.
  • Guillera-Arroita, Gurutzeta
  • McCarthy, Michael A.

Abstract

When undertaking surveillance for multiple species, the probability of detecting each species at a site for a given level of survey effort is rarely 1. There is a trade-off between the number of sites to survey, and the survey effort per site. This trade off is exceedingly important in conservation, which must meet the objectives on a limited budget. The costs of surveillance can be classified as either site establishment costs or the costs of visiting, surveying and processing data from each site. Here we examine a scenario in which each of s species occupies a fraction of the possible survey sites (ψi) and we define qi as the probability of failing to detect species i, given a unit of survey effort at occupied sites. The establishment of a site has a fixed cost (c) and each survey of a site has a set cost per unit of survey effort (t) which we set to 1 as part of the analysis such that c and B are relative to t. The cost of establishing and surveying is constrained by the total survey budget available (B). We show that the expected number of detections summed across s species is maximised by visiting sites with a particular survey effort (v) that depends on c, ψi, t and qi (but not B (total survey budget)). The multi-species solution is able to determine the optimal survey effort for any number of species when there is heterogeneity in the probability of failed detection or probability of occupancy between species. This ensures surveys can be representative of the species assemblages in the area of interest and that less detectable species can be considered within the optimisation. While much work has been done to examine single-species approaches to survey effort for conservation, here we examine a multi-species approach which optimises the detection of any of the target species, particularly relevant to biosecurity and threatened species conservation. This ensures that researchers can allocate survey effort to maximise the detection of species across multiple sites. To illustrate the application of the method we apply it to a multi-species surveillance program that monitored two species of forest owls and four arboreal marsupials.

Suggested Citation

  • Newman, Kevin D. & Guillera-Arroita, Gurutzeta & McCarthy, Michael A., 2025. "An analytical solution for optimising multi-species detection surveys," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 508(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:508:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001541
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025001541
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenneth F Kellner & Robert K Swihart, 2014. "Accounting for Imperfect Detection in Ecology: A Quantitative Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-8, October.
    2. Alana L Moore & Michael A McCarthy & Kirsten M Parris & Joslin L Moore, 2014. "The Optimal Number of Surveys when Detectability Varies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita & José J. Lahoz-Monfort, 2017. "Species occupancy estimation and imperfect detection: shall surveys continue after the first detection?," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 101(4), pages 381-398, October.
    4. Newman, Kevin D. & Nelson, Jenny L. & Durkin, Louise K. & Cripps, Jemma K. & McCarthy, Michael A., 2022. "An analytical solution for optimising detections when accounting for site establishment costs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 473(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Newman, Kevin D. & Nelson, Jenny L. & Durkin, Louise K. & Cripps, Jemma K. & McCarthy, Michael A., 2022. "An analytical solution for optimising detections when accounting for site establishment costs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 473(C).
    2. Aubry, Philippe & Francesiaz, Charlotte & Guillemain, Matthieu, 2024. "On the impact of preferential sampling on ecological status and trend assessment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 492(C).
    3. Roland Langrock & David L. Borchers, 2017. "Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue on “Ecological Statistics”," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 101(4), pages 345-347, October.
    4. Tenan, S. & Maffioletti, C. & Caccianiga, M. & Compostella, C. & Seppi, R. & Gobbi, M., 2016. "Hierarchical models for describing space-for-time variations in insect population size and sex-ratio along a primary succession," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 329(C), pages 18-28.
    5. Matt Higham & Jay Ver Hoef & Lisa Madsen & Andy Aderman, 2021. "Adjusting a finite population block kriging estimator for imperfect detection," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), February.
    6. Whitlock, Steven L. & Womble, Jamie N. & Peterson, James T., 2020. "Modelling pinniped abundance and distribution by combining counts at terrestrial sites and in-water sightings," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 420(C).
    7. Bonneau, Mathieu & Martin, Julien & Peyrard, Nathalie & Rodgers, Leroy & Romagosa, Christina M. & Johnson, Fred A., 2019. "Optimal spatial allocation of control effort to manage invasives in the face of imperfect detection and misclassification," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 392(C), pages 108-116.
    8. De Cubber, Lola & Trenkel, Verena M. & Diez, Guzman & Gil-Herrera, Juan & Novoa Pabon, Ana Maria & Eme, David & Lorance, Pascal, 2023. "Robust identification of potential habitats of a rare demersal species (blackspot seabream) in the Northeast Atlantic," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 477(C).
    9. Hee-Young Kim & Christian H. Weiß & Tobias A. Möller, 2018. "Testing for an excessive number of zeros in time series of bounded counts," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 27(4), pages 689-714, December.
    10. David L. Borchers & Tiago A. Marques, 2017. "From distance sampling to spatial capture–recapture," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 101(4), pages 475-494, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:508:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.