Author
Listed:
- Terra dos Santos, Luiz C.
- Giannetti, Biagio F.
- Agostinho, Feni
- Almeida, Cecilia M.V.B.
Abstract
Global concerns regarding sustainable development have become commonplace in all decision-making scales and have been accompanied by the need to develop proper modeling systems. Indicators and goals recognizing the interconnections between social, economic, and ecological systems are increasingly acknowledged as a necessary pathway, urging research efforts and extensive literature reviews to explore and combine indicators. The Five Sectors Sustainability Model is presented as a multi-criteria decision-making tool to compose a comprehensive view of global sustainability performance between 2000 and 2022, considering the progress or deviation from proposed goals and targets. Since few publications address the challenges faced in all geographic regions, especially in the Global South, this study presents the Five Sector Sustainability Model as a multi-criteria decision-making tool for ranking sustainability performance in 164 nations. The results indicate that few nations remained at the top of the sustainability ranking, primarily due to environmental and economic factors, while 58 countries maintained a medium sustainability level. At the other end of the spectrum, 12 countries consistently ranked low in sustainability performance throughout the studied timeframe. The diversity of economies at each sustainability level and their performance over time suggests that, despite the United Nations' fundamental role in supporting countries to overcome sustainability challenges, the growth of international cooperation for sustainable development and the global approach to the Sustainable Development Goals, local initiatives remain essential for fostering global sustainability.
Suggested Citation
Terra dos Santos, Luiz C. & Giannetti, Biagio F. & Agostinho, Feni & Almeida, Cecilia M.V.B., 2025.
"Modeling a comprehensive multi-criteria, multi-period framework for assessing global sustainability performance: Insights from 164 selected countries,"
Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 507(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:507:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001528
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111167
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:507:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.