Author
Listed:
- Stepka, Thiago Floriani
- de Mattos, Patrícia Povoa
- Filho, Afonso Figueiredo
- Machado, Sebastião do Amaral
- Braz, Evaldo Muñoz
Abstract
This study modeled the diameter growth of Araucaria angustifolia, Cedrela fissilis, and Ocotea porosa as a function of age and analyzed how these factors are related to diameter distribution. This analysis was used to describe behavior in terms of age and lifespan, and also determined periods of technical growth stagnation for each species. Diameter growth was evaluated via partial trunk analysis using increment cores from 30 trees per species in six study locations in southern Brazil (totaling 480 cores), collected in proportion to diameter distribution. Twelve biological models were utilized to estimate diameter growth as a function of age of the species in the different locations. The Weibull probabilistic density function with three parameters was adjusted to represent the diametric structure and indicate carrying capacity. Distinct ages were identified in the different study locations, indicating successions in separate periods during the past as well as locations with the least alterations (oldest successions). The diameters at the technical age of stagnation and carrying capacity were found to be generally similar, demonstrating the relationship between diameter structure and diameter increment. Maximum vigor in the three species was found to occur at diameters considerably smaller than the maximum value, suggesting that attainment of significant ages and diameters may not fully reflect the inherent potential of all individuals within the species under study. The maximum diameter increment vigor in the species under analysis was observed during the early stages of development, and tended to diminish in the subsequent phases.
Suggested Citation
Stepka, Thiago Floriani & de Mattos, Patrícia Povoa & Filho, Afonso Figueiredo & Machado, Sebastião do Amaral & Braz, Evaldo Muñoz, 2025.
"How are diameter growth, forest structure and carrying capacity related in tree populations?,"
Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 506(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:506:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001267
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111141
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:506:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.