IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v506y2025ics0304380025001206.html

Environmental system dynamics: Current development and applications

Author

Listed:
  • Xin, Sihui
  • Li, Zhouyuan
  • Nong, Junsong
  • Wu, Jiaxin
  • Zou, Xinwei
  • Wu, Ruijin
  • Dong, Shikui
  • Wu, Rongling
  • Wang, Shaopeng

Abstract

System Dynamics (SD) has emerged as a fundamental and powerful modeling methodology for understanding and simulating the behavior of both natural and social-economic systems. This review explores the historical development, key concepts, and broad applications of SD as a fundamental modeling approach. Tracing its evolution from the its inception since 1960s, the paper outlines the four major phases of SD's growth, from its initial conceptualization, through its methodological refinements, to its widespread application in ecosystems, and socio-economic systems in recent over the half century. The review highlights the development of SD communities across the globe, including the North American school, European clusters, and the growing body of work in China, and the progress in the global collaboration. We discuss and organize the foundational paired concepts of SD, including stock-flow relationships, the structure-behavior paradigm, the cause-effect process, and the loop-feedback paradigm. We summarize the SD modeling workflow protocol in the four stages, as conceptualization, visualization, quantification, and verification. It demonstrates good practices of SD modeling in various ecological contexts, spanning population, community, landscape, and macro-ecosystem levels, while emphasizing the method's adaptability and capacity for spatial modeling. Building on an extensive literature review and bibliometric analysis, the paper synthesizes key progress in SD modeling while offering insights into future perspectives and potential advancements. It concludes by reflecting on SD's ability to address multi-scale, multi-dimensional challenges and its compatibility with emerging novel approaches. Our goal is to bridge SD with contemporary ecological modeling practices by systematically reviewing the theoretical and practical advances of SD. This review provides insights for scholars and practitioners seeking to embed SD approach to the environmental and ecological systems simulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin, Sihui & Li, Zhouyuan & Nong, Junsong & Wu, Jiaxin & Zou, Xinwei & Wu, Ruijin & Dong, Shikui & Wu, Rongling & Wang, Shaopeng, 2025. "Environmental system dynamics: Current development and applications," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 506(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:506:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001206
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025001206
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gold, Stefan & Schleper, Martin C., 2017. "A pathway towards true sustainability: A recognition foundation of sustainable supply chain management," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 425-429.
    2. José D. Morcillo & Fabiola Angulo & Carlos J. Franco, 2020. "Analyzing the Hydroelectricity Variability on Power Markets from a System Dynamics and Dynamic Systems Perspective: Seasonality and ENSO Phenomenon," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-25, May.
    3. repec:plo:pone00:0202877 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Gary S. Metcalf & Kyoichi Kijima & Hiroshi Deguchi & Mary C. Edson & Peter Jones & John J. Kineman & James Martin & Shankar Sankaran & Carol A. Wessman, 2021. "Introduction to the Handbook of Systems Sciences," Springer Books, in: Gary S. Metcalf & Kyoichi Kijima & Hiroshi Deguchi (ed.), Handbook of Systems Sciences, chapter 1, pages 3-25, Springer.
    5. Kwakkel, Jan H. & Pruyt, Erik, 2013. "Exploratory Modeling and Analysis, an approach for model-based foresight under deep uncertainty," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 419-431.
    6. Bingbo Gao & Jianyu Yang & Ziyue Chen & George Sugihara & Manchun Li & Alfred Stein & Mei-Po Kwan & Jinfeng Wang, 2023. "Causal inference from cross-sectional earth system data with geographical convergent cross mapping," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Benjamin Dennis, 2022. "Climate Change and Financial Policy: A Literature Review," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2022-048, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    8. Patten, Bernard C., 2014. "Systems ecology and environmentalism: Getting the science right. Part I: Facets for a more holistic Nature Book of ecology," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 293(C), pages 4-21.
    9. Feichtinger, Gustav & Wrzaczek, Stefan, 2024. "The optimal momentum of population growth and decline," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 51-66.
    10. Enayat A. Moallemi & Sibel Eker & Lei Gao & Michalis Hadjikakou & Qi Liu & Jan Kwakkel & Patrick M. Reed & Michael Obersteiner & Zhaoxia Guo & Brett A. Bryan, 2020. "Early systems change necessary for catalyzing long-term sustainability in a post-2030 agenda," Papers 2012.04333, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    11. Geoffrey B. West & James H. Brown & Brian J. Enquist, 1997. "A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology," Working Papers 97-03-019, Santa Fe Institute.
    12. Henry Amorocho‐Daza & Pieter van der Zaag & Janez Sušnik, 2024. "Ethical considerations of using system dynamics in participatory settings: a social‐ecological‐systems perspective," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(2), April.
    13. Feng, Lianyong & Li, Junchen & Pang, Xiongqi, 2008. "China's oil reserve forecast and analysis based on peak oil models," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 4149-4153, November.
    14. Vincenot, Christian Ernest & Giannino, Francesco & Rietkerk, Max & Moriya, Kazuyuki & Mazzoleni, Stefano, 2011. "Theoretical considerations on the combined use of System Dynamics and individual-based modeling in ecology," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 210-218.
    15. Feng, Le & Chen, Bin & Hayat, Tasawar & Alsaedi, Ahmed & Ahmad, Bashir, 2017. "Dynamic forecasting of agricultural water footprint based on Markov Chain-a case study of the Heihe River Basin," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 353(C), pages 150-157.
    16. Sterman, J.D., 2006. "Learning from evidence in a complex world," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(3), pages 505-514.
    17. Jan H. Kwakkel & Erik Pruyt, 2015. "Using System Dynamics for Grand Challenges: The ESDMA Approach," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 358-375, May.
    18. Amorocho-Daza, Henry & Sušnik, Janez & van der Zaag, Pieter & Slinger, Jill H., 2025. "A model-based policy analysis framework for social-ecological systems: Integrating uncertainty and participation in system dynamics modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 499(C).
    19. Simon K Chiu & Louise Freebairn & Louise A Baur & L. Kurt Kreuger & Adam Skinner & Jo‐An Occhipinti, 2023. "Modeling distribution parameters in system dynamics: an application in childhood obesity," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 39(2), pages 103-124, April.
    20. Ali Mirchi & Kaveh Madani & David Watkins & Sajjad Ahmad, 2012. "Synthesis of System Dynamics Tools for Holistic Conceptualization of Water Resources Problems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(9), pages 2421-2442, July.
    21. Liu, Gengyuan & Yang, Zhifeng & Chen, Bin & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2014. "Emergy-based dynamic mechanisms of urban development, resource consumption and environmental impacts," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 271(C), pages 90-102.
    22. Xianling Zhang & Fei Guo & Zhenwu Zhai, 2019. "China’s Demographic Future Under the New Two-Child Policy," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 38(4), pages 537-563, August.
    23. Heidi Ledford, 2015. "How to solve the world's biggest problems," Nature, Nature, vol. 525(7569), pages 308-311, September.
    24. Ghosh, Sinchan & Basir, Fahad Al & Chowdhury, Ganesh & Bhattacharya, Sabyasachi & Ray, Santanu, 2021. "Is the primary helper always a key group for the dynamics of cooperative birds? A mathematical study on cooperative breeding birds," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 459(C).
    25. Asmeret Naugle & Saeed Langarudi & Timothy Clancy, 2024. "What is (quantitative) system dynamics modeling? Defining characteristics and the opportunities they create," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(2), April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amorocho-Daza, Henry & Sušnik, Janez & van der Zaag, Pieter & Slinger, Jill H., 2025. "A model-based policy analysis framework for social-ecological systems: Integrating uncertainty and participation in system dynamics modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 499(C).
    2. Grimm, Volker & Berger, Uta, 2016. "Structural realism, emergence, and predictions in next-generation ecological modelling: Synthesis from a special issue," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 177-187.
    3. Nugroho, Supradianto, 2025. "Operationalizing social-ecological system-based fishery management employing a system dynamics model: Lessons from eel fishery," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 509(C).
    4. Kwamina Ewur Banson & Daniel Kwasi Asare & Fidelis Doodaa Dery & Kwadwo Boakye & Akudugu Boniface & Moses Asamoah & Lourees Esi Awotwe, 2020. "Impact of Fall Armyworm on Farmer’s Maize: Systemic Approach," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 237-264, April.
    5. Luciano Raso & Jan Kwakkel & Jos Timmermans & Geremy Panthou, 2019. "How to evaluate a monitoring system for adaptive policies: criteria for signposts selection and their model-based evaluation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 267-283, March.
    6. Erik Pruyt & Tushith Islam, 2015. "On generating and exploring the behavior space of complex models," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 31(4), pages 220-249, October.
    7. Castrejon-Campos, Omar & Aye, Lu & Hui, Felix Kin Peng & Vaz-Serra, Paulo, 2022. "Economic and environmental impacts of public investment in clean energy RD&D," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    8. Elliott, Robert J.R. & Sun, Puyang & Xu, Qiqin, 2015. "Energy distribution and economic growth: An empirical test for China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 24-31.
    9. Zhang, XiaoHong & Cao, Jun & Li, JinRong & Deng, ShiHuai & Zhang, YanZong & Wu, Jun, 2015. "Influence of sewage treatment on China׳s energy consumption and economy and its performances," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1009-1018.
    10. Zhang, Shulin & Su, Xiaoling & Singh, Vijay P & Ayantobo, Olusola Olaitan & Xie, Juan, 2018. "Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) decomposition analysis of changes in agricultural water use: a case study of the middle reaches of the Heihe River basin, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 422-430.
    11. Chen, Yanguang, 2014. "An allometric scaling relation based on logistic growth of cities," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 65-77.
    12. Sridharan, Sanjeev & Jones, Bobby & Caudill, Barry & Nakaima, April, 2016. "Steps towards incorporating heterogeneities into program theory: A case study of a data-driven approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 88-97.
    13. Karen Minyard & Tina A. Smith & Richard Turner & Bobby Milstein & Lori Solomon, 2018. "Community and programmatic factors influencing effective use of system dynamic models," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 34(1-2), pages 154-171, January.
    14. Wenjing Luo & Zhi Qiu & Yurika Yokoyama & Shengyuan Zheng, 2022. "Decision-Making Mechanism of Joint Activities for the Elderly and Children in Integrated Welfare Facilities: A Discussion Based on “Motivation–Constraint” Interaction Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-23, August.
    15. Giannetti, Biagio F. & Marcilio, Maria De Fatima D.F.B. & Coscieme, Luca & Agostinho, Feni & Liu, Gengyuan & Almeida, Cecilia M.V.B., 2019. "Howard Odum’s “Self-organization, transformity and information”: Three decades of empirical evidence," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 407(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Abduraupov, Rustam & Akhmadjanova, Gulmira & Ibragimov, Abdulla & Bala, B.K. & Sidique, Shaufique F. & Makhmudov, Miraziz & Angelina, Kim, 2022. "Modeling of water management for cotton production in Uzbekistan," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    17. Kimberly M. Thompson & Radboud J. Duintjer Tebbens, 2006. "Retrospective Cost‐Effectiveness Analyses for Polio Vaccination in the United States," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1423-1440, December.
    18. Lewe, J.-H. & Hivin, L.F. & Mavris, D.N., 2014. "A multi-paradigm approach to system dynamics modeling of intercity transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 188-202.
    19. Inês Figueira & Rayan Succar & Roni Barak Ventura & Maurizio Porfiri, 2025. "Urban scaling with censored data," PLOS Complex Systems, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(1), pages 1-22, January.
    20. Paredes-Vergara, Matías & Cerda-Arias, José Luis & Palma-Behnke, Rodrigo & Haas, Jannik, 2025. "A framework for integrating deep uncertainty in power systems planning: an application to the Chilean case," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 398(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:506:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.