IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v489y2024ics0304380023003381.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Oak regeneration facing deer browsing: Can competition between saplings offset the diversion effect? A simulation experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Barrere, Julien
  • Ligot, Gauthier
  • Boulanger, Vincent
  • Collet, Catherine
  • Courbaud, Benoît
  • de Coligny, François
  • Mårell, Anders
  • Saïd, Sonia
  • Balandier, Philippe

Abstract

The constraint caused by wild ungulates on forest regeneration is increasing worldwide. Hypotheses for plant association effects predict that species susceptible to herbivory can gain protection from other neighbouring plant species. In theory, such interactions could help limit the impact of browsing on the regeneration of specific tree species. However, the presence of neighbouring species can also result in increasing competition for resources between species. The resultant effects on forest regeneration of these interactions, both positive (protection against herbivores) and negative (inter-specific competition) are still unclear.

Suggested Citation

  • Barrere, Julien & Ligot, Gauthier & Boulanger, Vincent & Collet, Catherine & Courbaud, Benoît & de Coligny, François & Mårell, Anders & Saïd, Sonia & Balandier, Philippe, 2024. "Oak regeneration facing deer browsing: Can competition between saplings offset the diversion effect? A simulation experiment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 489(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:489:y:2024:i:c:s0304380023003381
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380023003381
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110608?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:489:y:2024:i:c:s0304380023003381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.