IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v383y2018icp31-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A test of functional convergence in carbon fluxes from coupled C and N cycles in Arctic tundra

Author

Listed:
  • Wright, Kelseyann S.
  • Rocha, Adrian V.

Abstract

Arctic ecosystems exhibit functional convergence in Net Ecosystem Exchange (NEE’s) of CO2 response to light, air temperature, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and Leaf Area Index (LAI), potentially simplifying predictions of climate change impacts on the arctic C cycle over space and time. This convergence is hypothesized to be induced by tightly coupled carbon and nitrogen cycles, but has never been explicitly tested. We used model-data fusion on a mass balance model (i.e. the Coupled Carbon and Nitrogen; CCaN) to determine whether functional convergence in NEE results from tightly coupled carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycles. CCaN captured a majority, but not all, of NEE and NDVI observations across eight growing seasons, and MODIS NDVI observations across a tundra latitudinal gradient in Alaska. The hypothesis of temporal functional convergence was challenged by model-data disagreements for NEE during shoulder seasons and low light. The hypothesis of spatial functional convergence was challenged by the underestimation of NDVI in warm tundra. CCaN structure and parameter uncertainty analyses revealed that factors controlling leaf litter rate, the proportion of N in leaves, and net N mineralization rate are critical knowledge gaps in predicting pan-arctic NEE and NDVI in a future warmer climate.

Suggested Citation

  • Wright, Kelseyann S. & Rocha, Adrian V., 2018. "A test of functional convergence in carbon fluxes from coupled C and N cycles in Arctic tundra," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 383(C), pages 31-40.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:383:y:2018:i:c:p:31-40
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.05.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380018301844
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.05.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:383:y:2018:i:c:p:31-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.