IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v369y2018icp42-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A class exercise for Systems Ecology: Synthesis of stream energetics and testing Allen’s paradox

Author

Listed:
  • Hall, Charles A.S.
  • Knickmeyer, Frances
  • Wiegman, Adrian
  • Brainard, Andrew
  • Diaz, Avriel Rose
  • Huynh, Carolyn
  • Mead, Jerry

Abstract

We report energy stocks and flows, as well as other ecosystem properties, measured in Little Sandy Creek in Upstate New York as part of an intensive class project in a graduate-level Systems Ecology course at the SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry. Our study synthesizes information on Little Sandy Creek both as a whole system and through examination of key individual trophic components. We also test Allen’s paradox in Little Sandy Creek – whether there is enough biomass produced by the invertebrate community to support the energetic needs of the fish community. Students collected data in the field over the course of a weekend in September 2012. During the ensuing semester, we synthesized all of these data (often utilizing relatively simple quantitative models) to generate a spatial synthesis populated with trophic levels for a one kilometer reach of stream. We utilized two synthesizing procedures during our trophic flow analysis: first, we sampled organisms along a depth gradient, and modeled trophic levels and size class with depth to give more precise estimates of biomass. Second, we used models for the relation between production and also respiration (energy requirements) and organism size to estimate production and energy use of trophic levels and functional feeding groups. We synthesized and extrapolated upon our data with a numerical model that simulated the stocks and flows in Little Sandy Creek using abiotic forcing functions and functional responses derived from our field measurements. The mean values indicate the benthic macroinvertebrate production (11 kJ m−2 day−1) is insufficient to support the fish energy requirements (13 kJ m−2 day−1) within our uncertainty estimates; given an 80% assimilation efficiency for fish, the macroinvertebrate production is enough to supply only 68% of the fish needs. Our primary hypothesis was supported: students were able to thoroughly collect and organize data from Little Sandy Creek in a single weekend. Further, over the course of a semester, students successfully analyzed their data. We were then able to take that data and build a realistic model of the Little Sandy Creek system. Based on our model outputs, we fail to reject our secondary hypothesis that Allen’s paradox is present in Little Sandy Creek.

Suggested Citation

  • Hall, Charles A.S. & Knickmeyer, Frances & Wiegman, Adrian & Brainard, Andrew & Diaz, Avriel Rose & Huynh, Carolyn & Mead, Jerry, 2018. "A class exercise for Systems Ecology: Synthesis of stream energetics and testing Allen’s paradox," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 369(C), pages 42-65.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:369:y:2018:i:c:p:42-65
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.12.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380017303332
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.12.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Mingli & Wu, Zijian & Fu, Xinxi & Ouyang, Linnan & Wu, Xiaofu, 2021. "Thermodynamic analysis of an ecologically restored plant community:Number of species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:369:y:2018:i:c:p:42-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.