IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v349y2017icp33-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship between plants and soil resource patterns on forest land at different scales using a new theoretical model

Author

Listed:
  • Hou, Jian
  • Wang, Huiqing
  • Li, Zongshan

Abstract

Recently, plant root or crown size has been used in researching spatial relationships between plants and soil resources in most studies, and different methods have been used to address this relationship. However, few studies have reviewed the quantification of the relationship between plants and soil resources, and few studies have explained the roles of different plant functional groups on the soil resource distribution. In this paper, a method called integration of geostatistics, point pattern analysis and spatial comparison (IGPS) was used to quantify this relationship. The relationships between plants and soil resource patterns were evaluated from four plots with different spatial scales and different slopes within the Ziwuling Mountains of China. Several relationships were identified using IGPS. We have proved that in IGPS, the aggregation scale between plants and soil resources has been substituted for root or crown size to deeply reveal the spatial relationship between plants and soil resources. The results confirm that this method can not only determine which plant functional group can be affected by which resource but can also quantify the spatial relationship between plants and soil resources. These findings are important because this knowledge can be useful in formulating pasture and forest management strategies. IGPS is a powerful method to assist in study of the spatial relationships between plants and soil resources, and we recommend that this method be used worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Hou, Jian & Wang, Huiqing & Li, Zongshan, 2017. "Relationship between plants and soil resource patterns on forest land at different scales using a new theoretical model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 349(C), pages 33-40.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:349:y:2017:i:c:p:33-40
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.01.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030438001630326X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.01.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:349:y:2017:i:c:p:33-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.