IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v285y2014icp78-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling cougar habitat in the Northeastern United States

Author

Listed:
  • Glick, Henry B.

Abstract

While the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has declared the Eastern cougar (Puma concolor couguar) extinct, proposing to remove the subspecies from the Endangered Species List, in the Northeastern United States there are over 2300 eyewitness reports and nearly a dozen confirmed accounts of cougars. This discrepancy between what has been documented by management agencies and what has been perceived by regional residents raises questions about the current and future presence of cougars in the region, yet little work has been done to examine the Northeast's capacity to support this species. I used spatially-explicit Habitat Suitability Indices to model cougar habitat in the six New England states and that portion of New York East of the Hudson River. I present one original model and five models in which I replicated methods originally established by other authors outside of the study region. For each model I identified contiguous habitat parcels capable of supporting viable breeding populations of cougars according to two estimates of population range size. I evaluated model results by comparing the percent forested land cover within viable habitat patches to that associated with historic cougar kills. I also assessed model agreement by generating two ensemble models – one comprised of each individual model output, and one comprised of viable contiguous habitat that was coincident across all models. I found that all individual models and one ensemble model identified viable habitat according to both population range estimates, while the second ensemble model identified viable habitat according to the liberal range estimate only. Individual models identified between 20,457 and 160,971km2 of top ranking habitat, enough area to theoretically support between 322 and 2535 cougars. Collectively these models provide a set of heuristic tools that shed light on a species that could influence future trophic interactions in the region. In light of my findings and the active expansion of cougar territory into the Midwest, I recommend that regional management begin to educate local residents about the nature of human–cougar interactions, and to consider preliminary management strategies for dispersing Midwestern cougars as resources allow. I recommend also that future modeling efforts integrate human input from regional biologists, and that these models be used to help evaluate cougar sighting reliability.

Suggested Citation

  • Glick, Henry B., 2014. "Modeling cougar habitat in the Northeastern United States," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 285(C), pages 78-89.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:285:y:2014:i:c:p:78-89
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.02.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380014000891
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.02.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. LaRue, Michelle A. & Nielsen, Clayton K., 2011. "Modelling potential habitat for cougars in midwestern North America," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 897-900.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. LaRue, Michelle A. & Nielsen, Clayton K., 2016. "Population viability of recolonizing cougars in midwestern North America," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 321(C), pages 121-129.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:285:y:2014:i:c:p:78-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.