Author
Listed:
- Anteau, Michael J.
- Wiltermuth, Mark T.
- Sherfy, Mark H.
- Shaffer, Terry L.
Abstract
Measuring habitat and understanding habitat dynamics have become increasingly important for wildlife conservation. Using remotely-sensed data, we developed procedures to measure breeding habitat abundance for the federally listed piping plover (Charadrius melodus) at Lake Sakakawea, North Dakota, USA. We also developed a model to predict habitat abundance based on past and projected water levels, vegetation colonization rates, and topography. Previous studies define plover habitat as flat areas (<10% slope) with ≤30% obstruction of bare substrate. Compared to ground-based data, remotely-sensed habitat classifications (≤30/>30% bare-substrate obstruction) were 76% correct and omission and commission errors were equal. Due to water level fluctuations, habitat abundance varied markedly among years (1986–2009) ranging from 9 to 5195ha. The proportion bare substrate declined with the number of years since a contour was inundated until 5 years (βˆ=−0.65, SE=0.05), then it stabilized near zero, and the decline varied by shoreline segment (5, 50, and 95 percentile were βˆ=−0.19, SE=0.05, βˆ=−0.63, SE=0.05, and βˆ=−0.91, SE=0.05, respectively). Years since inundated predicted habitat abundance well at shoreline segments (R2=0.77), but it predicted better for the whole lake (R2=0.86). The vastness and dynamics of plover habitat on Lake Sakakawea suggest that this is a key area for conservation of this species. Model-based habitat predictions can benefit resource conservation because they can (1) form the basis for a sampling stratification, (2) help allocate monitoring efforts among areas, and (3) help inform management through simulations or what-if scenarios.
Suggested Citation
Anteau, Michael J. & Wiltermuth, Mark T. & Sherfy, Mark H. & Shaffer, Terry L., 2014.
"Measuring and predicting abundance and dynamics of habitat for piping plovers on a large reservoir,"
Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 16-27.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:272:y:2014:i:c:p:16-27
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.08.020
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:272:y:2014:i:c:p:16-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.