IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v222y2011i17p3181-3192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

River network structure shapes interannual feedbacks between adult sea lamprey migration and larval habitation

Author

Listed:
  • Neeson, Thomas M.
  • Wiley, Michael J.
  • Adlerstein, Sara A.
  • Riolo, Rick L.

Abstract

Adult sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinus) migrating upstream to spawn follow a pheromone released by instream larvae. The size (i.e. flow) of a tributary dilutes the concentration of this pheromone, such that the downstream propagation pattern of larval pheromone must be influenced by patterns in the relative sizes and numbers of confluent tributaries. We developed an individual-based model to explicitly test the resulting hypothesis that river network structure influences the migration decisions of adult lampreys following the larval pheromone, and in turn the distribution of larvae. First, we initialized the model using randomly generated river networks, and found a strong positive relationship between network diameter and larval aggregation. Larvae aggregated over time, and the degree and rate of this aggregation depended on network diameter. Second, we initialized the model using a river network based on the Muskegon River, Michigan, and compared model-generated larval distribution to available field survey data. We found a significant correlation between model-generated larval abundance and field-measured larval densities (r2=0.54; p<0.0001). We also found an inverse relationship between subwatershed area and the degree to which path-dependent effects influenced larval abundance in that subwatershed. Our results overall suggest that larval distribution across a watershed results from a system of context-dependent interannual feedbacks shaped by network structure and the past migratory and spawning behavior of adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Neeson, Thomas M. & Wiley, Michael J. & Adlerstein, Sara A. & Riolo, Rick L., 2011. "River network structure shapes interannual feedbacks between adult sea lamprey migration and larval habitation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(17), pages 3181-3192.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:222:y:2011:i:17:p:3181-3192
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.06.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380011003620
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.06.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hongxiang Wang & Lintong Huang & Jianwen Hu & Huan Yang & Wenxian Guo, 2022. "Effect of Urbanization on the River Network Structure in Zhengzhou City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Perkin, Joshuah S. & Gido, Keith B. & Al-Ta’ani, Ola & Scoglio, Caterina, 2013. "Simulating fish dispersal in stream networks fragmented by multiple road crossings," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 257(C), pages 44-56.
    3. Fitzpatrick, Kimberly B. & Neeson, Thomas M., 2018. "Aligning dam removals and road culvert upgrades boosts conservation return-on-investment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 198-204.
    4. Neeson, Thomas M. & Wiley, Michael J. & Adlerstein, Sara A. & Riolo, Rick L., 2012. "How river network structure and habitat availability shape the spatial dynamics of larval sea lampreys," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 62-70.
    5. Zhaoyi Shang & Yue Che & Kai Yang & Yu Jiang, 2012. "Assessing Local Communities’ Willingness to Pay for River Network Protection: A Contingent Valuation Study of Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:222:y:2011:i:17:p:3181-3192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.